• Sebastian Graf (10/10) May 16 2013 I aim to use a simplistic, rough edged property generator, but
• Simen Kjaeraas (10/20) May 16 2013 This is one of those weird things. I believe it is intentional, but
• Sebastian Graf (2/11) May 17 2013 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10103

"Sebastian Graf" <SebastianGraf t-online.de> writes:

I aim to use a simplistic, rough edged property generator, but
I'm having issues.
See http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/72837a7a.
My code and mixin logic seems to work basically, but it gets
hairy when using mixinMap to generate getters and setters from a
list in a recursive template fashion. It won't work if I generate
both getters and setters with mixinMap, but it compiles fine if I
e.g. want only getters.
Any help? I smell a compiler bug if I haven't done something
stupid.

"Simen Kjaeraas" <simen.kjaras gmail.com> writes:

On Thu, 16 May 2013 17:01:54 +0200, Sebastian Graf  
<SebastianGraf t-online.de> wrote:

 I aim to use a simplistic, rough edged property generator, but
 I'm having issues.
 See http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/72837a7a.
 My code and mixin logic seems to work basically, but it gets
 hairy when using mixinMap to generate getters and setters from a
 list in a recursive template fashion. It won't work if I generate
 both getters and setters with mixinMap, but it compiles fine if I
 e.g. want only getters.
 Any help? I smell a compiler bug if I haven't done something
 stupid.

This is one of those weird things. I believe it is intentional, but
I feel it should be a bug. Basically, overload sets cannot cross
mixin borders. So if two mixins create a function with the same name,
they don't overload properly.

I'd say add it to BugZilla if it's not already there. Comment on the
relevant bug if it is - this is not good for the language.

-- 
Simen

"Sebastian Graf" <SebastianGraf t-online.de> writes:

On Thursday, 16 May 2013 at 15:34:54 UTC, Simen Kjaeraas wrote:
 This is one of those weird things. I believe it is intentional, 
 but
 I feel it should be a bug. Basically, overload sets cannot cross
 mixin borders. So if two mixins create a function with the same 
 name,
 they don't overload properly.

 I'd say add it to BugZilla if it's not already there. Comment 
 on the
 relevant bug if it is - this is not good for the language.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10103