• simendsjo (14/14) Feb 06 2012 Not sure if this is a bug, or just some missing functionality of pure.
• Daniel Murphy (5/6) Feb 06 2012 I don't think so.
• simendsjo (2/8) Feb 06 2012 Thanks. Fixed in 2.059 perhaps? A long wait :)
• Daniel Murphy (3/15) Feb 06 2012 I wouldn't hold my breath.

simendsjo <simendsjo gmail.com> writes:

Not sure if this is a bug, or just some missing functionality of pure.

void f() pure {
   enum a = to!string("a"); // some legal compile-time to!()
}

Gives "to is not pure"

The following works:

template S(alias v) {
   enum S = to!string(v);
}
void g() pure {
   enum a = S!"a";
}

Should purity be checked at all if used with an enum?

Tested on dmd 2.057 / linux x64

"Daniel Murphy" <yebblies nospamgmail.com> writes:

"simendsjo" <simendsjo gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:jgo9if$1mg9$1 digitalmars.com...
 Should purity be checked at all if used with an enum?

I don't think so.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6169
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/652 

simendsjo <simendsjo gmail.com> writes:

On 02/06/2012 11:46 AM, Daniel Murphy wrote:
 "simendsjo"<simendsjo gmail.com>  wrote in message
 news:jgo9if$1mg9$1 digitalmars.com...
 Should purity be checked at all if used with an enum?

 I don't think so.

 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6169
 https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/652

Thanks. Fixed in 2.059 perhaps? A long wait :)

"Daniel Murphy" <yebblies nospamgmail.com> writes:

I wouldn't hold my breath.

"simendsjo" <simendsjo gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:jgoejk$23j1$1 digitalmars.com...
 On 02/06/2012 11:46 AM, Daniel Murphy wrote:
 "simendsjo"<simendsjo gmail.com>  wrote in message
 news:jgo9if$1mg9$1 digitalmars.com...
 Should purity be checked at all if used with an enum?

 I don't think so.

 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6169
 https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/652

 Thanks. Fixed in 2.059 perhaps? A long wait :)