• Zardoz (27/27) Jul 04 2011 How is the correct way of mix Pre and Post contracts and signature cons...
• simendsjo (7/32) Jul 04 2011 The "in" should be in a block of it's own:
• simendsjo (2/8) Jul 04 2011 I of course mean that if should not create a new block.
• Zardoz (5/16) Jul 04 2011 Thanks !
• simendsjo (17/31) Jul 04 2011 The if is called a template constrain:

Zardoz <luis.panadero gmail.com> writes:

How is the correct way of mix  Pre and Post contracts and signature constraints
?

I try this that looks logic way and not compile : 

T foo (T) (T a) 
if ( is(T : real)) {
 in {
	assert (a > 0); 
 }
 body {
	return a*2;
 }
}

I get this errors : 
Declaration expected, not 'if'
unrecognized declaration

And this with same result :

T foo (T) (T a) 
in {
	assert (a > 0); 
}
if ( is(T : real)) {
 body {
	return a*2;
 }
}

I'm using dmd 2.053.

-- 
Yep, I'm afraid that I have a blog : zardoz.es

simendsjo <simendsjo gmail.com> writes:

On 04.07.2011 19:20, Zardoz wrote:
 How is the correct way of mix  Pre and Post contracts and signature
constraints ?

 I try this that looks logic way and not compile :

 T foo (T) (T a)
 if ( is(T : real)) {
   in {
 	assert (a>  0);
   }
   body {
 	return a*2;
   }
 }

 I get this errors :
 Declaration expected, not 'if'
 unrecognized declaration

 And this with same result :

 T foo (T) (T a)
 in {
 	assert (a>  0);
 }
 if ( is(T : real)) {
   body {
 	return a*2;
   }
 }

 I'm using dmd 2.053.

The "in" should be in a block of it's own:

T foo(T)(T a)
if(...) // notice no { here
in {
} body {
}

simendsjo <simendsjo gmail.com> writes:

On 04.07.2011 19:42, simendsjo wrote:
 The "in" should be in a block of it's own:

 T foo(T)(T a)
 if(...) // notice no { here
 in {
 } body {
 }

I of course mean that if should not create a new block.

Zardoz <luis.panadero gmail.com> writes:

On Mon, 04 Jul 2011 19:52:10 +0200, simendsjo wrote:

 On 04.07.2011 19:42, simendsjo wrote:
 The "in" should be in a block of it's own:

 T foo(T)(T a)
 if(...) // notice no { here
 in {
 } body {
 }

 
 I of course mean that if should not create a new block.

Thanks !
I thought that the if () needs to make a block. :P




-- 
Yep, I'm afraid that I have a blog : zardoz.es

simendsjo <simendsjo gmail.com> writes:

On 04.07.2011 20:12, Zardoz wrote:
 On Mon, 04 Jul 2011 19:52:10 +0200, simendsjo wrote:

 On 04.07.2011 19:42, simendsjo wrote:
 The "in" should be in a block of it's own:

 T foo(T)(T a)
 if(...) // notice no { here
 in {
 } body {
 }

 I of course mean that if should not create a new block.

 Thanks !
 I thought that the if () needs to make a block. :P

The if is called a template constrain: 
http://www.d-programming-language.org/template.html#Constraint

T foo(T)(T a) is a shorthand (I think) for

template foo(T) {
   T foo(T a) {
   }
}

The constraint refers to the template part:

template foo(T) if(is(T:real)) {
   T foo(T a) {
   }
}

Because the template only contain a single member, and it's named the 
same as the template, you can instantiate it directly as foo(1.2);
If the function was named bar, you'd have to instantiate it yourself: 
foo!real.bar(1.2);