• =?UTF-8?B?Tm9yZGzDtnc=?= (45/45) Dec 05 2017 If I get the following stack trace ___without line numbers___
• Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) (4/7) Dec 12 2017 Linux stack trace line numbers have disappeard for me, too. Used to
• Mike Franklin (2/5) Dec 12 2017 https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18068

=?UTF-8?B?Tm9yZGzDtnc=?= <per.nordlow gmail.com> writes:

If I get the following stack trace ___without line numbers___ 
(instead ??:?) what's missing?

core.exception.AssertError src/knet/linking.d(444): Assertion 
failure
----------------
??:? _d_assertp [0x5092ab19]
??:? pure  safe knet.storage.Edge 
knet.linking.dlink!(knet.storage.ZingOf!(knet.storage.NodeInst).ZingOf[],
knet.storage.ZingOf!(knet.storage.NodeInst).ZingOf[]).dlink(knet.storage.ZingOf!(knet.storage
NodeInst).ZingOf[], knet.rel.Rel,
knet.storage.ZingOf!(knet.storage.NodeInst).ZingOf[], knet.origins.Origin,
double, bool) [0x5081b323]
??:? pure  safe knet.storage.Edge 
knet.linking.dlink(knet.storage.ZingOf!(knet.storage.NodeInst).ZingOf,
knet.rel.Rel, knet.storage.ZingOf!(knet.storage.NodeInst).ZingOf,
knet.origins.Origin, double, bool) [0x50819ec6]
??:? pure  safe 
knet.storage.ZingOf!(knet.storage.NodeInst).ZingOf 
knet.patterns.oneOrMore(knet.storage.ZingOf!(knet.storage.NodeInst).ZingOf)
[0x508400aa]
??:? pure  safe 
knet.storage.ZingOf!(knet.storage.NodeInst).ZingOf 
knet.patterns.nounPhrase(knet.base.Db, languages.Lang) 
[0x508401d4]
??:? pure  safe void 
knet.patterns.__unittest_src_knet_patterns_d_286_3() [0x50841afb]
??:? void knet.patterns.__modtest() [0x50841d1f]
??:? int 
core.runtime.runModuleUnitTests().__foreachbody2(object.ModuleInfo*)
[0x5094d98c]
??:? int object.ModuleInfo.opApply(scope int 
delegate(object.ModuleInfo*)).__lambda2(immutable(object.ModuleInfo*))
[0x509229d2]
??:? int rt.minfo.moduleinfos_apply(scope int 
delegate(immutable(object.ModuleInfo*))).__foreachbody2(ref 
rt.sections_elf_shared.DSO) [0x50933001]
??:? int rt.sections_elf_shared.DSO.opApply(scope int 
delegate(ref rt.sections_elf_shared.DSO)) [0x50933090]
??:? int rt.minfo.moduleinfos_apply(scope int 
delegate(immutable(object.ModuleInfo*))) [0x50932f8d]
??:? int object.ModuleInfo.opApply(scope int 
delegate(object.ModuleInfo*)) [0x509229a9]
??:? runModuleUnitTests [0x5094d870]
??:? void rt.dmain2._d_run_main(int, char**, extern (C) int 
function(char[][])*).runAll() [0x5092e29a]
??:? void rt.dmain2._d_run_main(int, char**, extern (C) int 
function(char[][])*).tryExec(scope void delegate()) [0x5092e233]
??:? _d_run_main [0x5092e1a3]
??:? main [0x506833e9]
??:? __libc_start_main [0xb9a7b1c0]


I'm compiling with flags

-vcolumns -dip25 -vcolumns -dip25 -vcolumns -dip25 -c 
-of.dub/build/application-unittest-linux.posix-x86_64-dmd_2077-CB3BD7AAC3F0D7B6FD8DE72B
286ACE5/knetquery.o -debug -g -unittest -w

and using DMD 2.077.1

"Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa)" <SeeWebsiteToContactMe semitwist.com> writes:

On 12/05/2017 08:43 AM, Nordlöw wrote:
 If I get the following stack trace ___without line numbers___ (instead 
 ??:?) what's missing?
 

Linux stack trace line numbers have disappeard for me, too. Used to 
work. Very frustrating, and a royal PITA when dealing with unittests. 
Help would be appreciated. Could it be a PIC thing?

Mike Franklin <slavo5150 yahoo.com> writes:

On Tuesday, 5 December 2017 at 13:43:38 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
 If I get the following stack trace ___without line numbers___ 
 (instead ??:?) what's missing?

 and using DMD 2.077.1

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18068