www.digitalmars.com         C & C++   DMDScript  

digitalmars.D.learn - Learning Vibe.d

reply Russel Winder <russel winder.org.uk> writes:
Hi,

I thought I would try and do the async version of my mock AVR850 using the
vibe.d TCP stuff. This is not HTTP, it is proper networking! ;-)

Problem one is that vibe.d sever processes never seem to terminate.

I am using runApplication or more likely runEventLoop in my main but it nev=
er
returns. Starting the server from the command line, I Ctrl+C the process an=
d
get the message:

[main(----) INF] Received signal 2. Shutting down.

but whilst I get a command line prompt, the process is not terminated.

This is a bit of a blocker so help very much required.

--=20
Russel.
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
Dr Russel Winder      t: +44 20 7585 2200
41 Buckmaster Road    m: +44 7770 465 077
London SW11 1EN, UK   w: www.russel.org.uk
May 23 2020
next sibling parent reply bauss <jj_1337 live.dk> writes:
On Saturday, 23 May 2020 at 15:47:59 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
 Hi,

 I thought I would try and do the async version of my mock 
 AVR850 using the vibe.d TCP stuff. This is not HTTP, it is 
 proper networking! ;-)

 Problem one is that vibe.d sever processes never seem to 
 terminate.

 I am using runApplication or more likely runEventLoop in my 
 main but it never returns. Starting the server from the command 
 line, I Ctrl+C the process and get the message:

 [main(----) INF] Received signal 2. Shutting down.

 but whilst I get a command line prompt, the process is not 
 terminated.

 This is a bit of a blocker so help very much required.
Had similar experiences on non-windows platforms. I think the solution is just to kill the pid.
May 23 2020
parent reply Russel Winder <russel winder.org.uk> writes:
On Sat, 2020-05-23 at 16:56 +0000, bauss via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
[=E2=80=A6]
=20
 Had similar experiences on non-windows platforms.
I forgot to mention I was on Linux (Debian Sid). I am (sort of) pleased it isn't just me =E2=80=93 definitely unhappy it has= happened to others as well.
 I think the solution is just to kill the pid.
Killing from the command line is not really an option as the process is use= d in integration tests.=20 I guess I'll have to send the process SIGKILL rather than SIGTERM, which is= a bit annoying. --=20 Russel. =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk
May 23 2020
parent bauss <jj_1337 live.dk> writes:
On Saturday, 23 May 2020 at 17:57:22 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
 On Sat, 2020-05-23 at 16:56 +0000, bauss via 
 Digitalmars-d-learn wrote: […]
 
 Had similar experiences on non-windows platforms.
I forgot to mention I was on Linux (Debian Sid). I am (sort of) pleased it isn't just me – definitely unhappy it has happened to others as well.
 I think the solution is just to kill the pid.
Killing from the command line is not really an option as the process is used in integration tests. I guess I'll have to send the process SIGKILL rather than SIGTERM, which is a bit annoying.
Yes, when I saw it happening then I thought it was probably just me. Since it's not then perhaps an issue should be reported for vibe.d
May 23 2020
prev sibling parent reply Steven Schveighoffer <schveiguy yahoo.com> writes:
On Saturday, 23 May 2020 at 15:47:59 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
 Hi,

 I thought I would try and do the async version of my mock 
 AVR850 using the vibe.d TCP stuff. This is not HTTP, it is 
 proper networking! ;-)

 Problem one is that vibe.d sever processes never seem to 
 terminate.

 I am using runApplication or more likely runEventLoop in my 
 main but it never returns. Starting the server from the command 
 line, I Ctrl+C the process and get the message:

 [main(----) INF] Received signal 2. Shutting down.

 but whilst I get a command line prompt, the process is not 
 terminated.

 This is a bit of a blocker so help very much required.
It’s a recent problem with vibe-core. I’ve had to switch back to version 1.8.1. https://github.com/vibe-d/vibe-core/issues/205 -Steve
May 23 2020
next sibling parent Russel Winder <russel winder.org.uk> writes:
On Sat, 2020-05-23 at 20:52 +0000, Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d-
learn wrote:
[=E2=80=A6]
=20
 It=E2=80=99s a recent problem with vibe-core. I=E2=80=99ve had to switch =
back to=20
 version 1.8.1.
=20
 https://github.com/vibe-d/vibe-core/issues/205
Really good to know this is a genuine problem and not just me doing somethi= ng wrong! :-) For my purposes switching to using SIGKILL rather than SIGTERM in my tests seems to work with 1.9.1, so I'll go with that till 1.9.2 or 1.10.0 produce= s a fix rather than revert to 1.8.1. --=20 Russel. =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk
May 24 2020
prev sibling parent reply Daniel Kozak <kozzi11 gmail.com> writes:
On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 10:06 AM Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d-learn
<digitalmars-d-learn puremagic.com> wrote:
 For my purposes switching to using SIGKILL rather than SIGTERM in my tests
 seems to work with 1.9.1, so I'll go with that till 1.9.2 or 1.10.0 produces a
 fix rather than revert to 1.8.1.
You can use VibeHighEventPriority version in your dub as a workaround for now, there is no need to revert to 1.8.1
May 25 2020
parent Steven Schveighoffer <schveiguy gmail.com> writes:
On 5/25/20 5:49 AM, Daniel Kozak wrote:
 On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 10:06 AM Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d-learn
 <digitalmars-d-learn puremagic.com> wrote:
 For my purposes switching to using SIGKILL rather than SIGTERM in my tests
 seems to work with 1.9.1, so I'll go with that till 1.9.2 or 1.10.0 produces a
 fix rather than revert to 1.8.1.
You can use VibeHighEventPriority version in your dub as a workaround for now, there is no need to revert to 1.8.1
I'm thinking of actually reverting to something earlier or trying to get 1.9.0 to work. I am getting tons of spurious errors in vibe-core (see [1]). The latest cost me about 2 days of tracking down an error, where occasionally (still not sure of the situation) the connection to the database is spuriously closed before the response can be fully read. I was not getting these in an earlier version of the build. -Steve [1] https://github.com/vibe-d/vibe-core/issues/208
May 26 2020