• Heinz (4/4) Jan 20 2007 Hi, i was reading the interfaces chapter in http://www.digitalmars.com/d...
• Carlos Santander (7/13) Jan 20 2007 I was going to say that it's just poorly written, but IIRC that behavior...

Heinz <billgates microsoft.com> writes:

Hi, i was reading the interfaces chapter in
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/interface.html and it says "Interfaces correspond
to the interface exposed by operating system objects, like COM/OLE/ActiveX for
Win32".
Does this mean i can't use interfaces on unix operating systems?

An interface can have a constructor and destructor?

Thanks in advance.

Carlos Santander <csantander619 gmail.com> writes:

Heinz escribió:
 Hi, i was reading the interfaces chapter in
 http://www.digitalmars.com/d/interface.html and it says "Interfaces
 correspond to the interface exposed by operating system objects, like
 COM/OLE/ActiveX for Win32". Does this mean i can't use interfaces on unix
 operating systems?
 

I was going to say that it's just poorly written, but IIRC that behavior
changed 
many versions ago. I can't find that change, but check the bottom of that page: 
it says that COM interfaces are those derived from std.c.windows.com.IUnknown. 
So, go ahead and use them as you would in Java.

-- 
Carlos Santander Bernal