www.digitalmars.com         C & C++   DMDScript  

digitalmars.D.learn - How to create a mutable array of strings?

reply "Dennis Ritchie" <dennis.ritchie mail.ru> writes:
Hi,
It seems to me, or D do not create mutable array of strings?

How to create a mutable equivalent of a string array?

-----
string[] s = ["foo", "bar"];
// s[1][1] = 't'; // immutable expression s[1][1]
May 17 2015
next sibling parent reply "Dennis Ritchie" <dennis.ritchie mail.ru> writes:
On Sunday, 17 May 2015 at 09:06:40 UTC, Dennis Ritchie wrote:
 Hi,
 It seems to me, or D do not create mutable array of strings?

 How to create a mutable equivalent of a string array?

 -----
 string[] s = ["foo", "bar"];
 // s[1][1] = 't'; // immutable expression s[1][1]
It's uncomfortable: ----- char[][] s = [['f', 'o', 'o'], ['b', 'a', 'r']]; s[1][1] = 't';
May 17 2015
next sibling parent reply "Dennis Ritchie" <dennis.ritchie mail.ru> writes:
This option is also a strange:

char[][] s = ["foo".dup, "bar".dup];
s[1][1] = 't';

In my opinion, you need to add to D keyword mutable.
May 17 2015
parent reply Steven Schveighoffer <schveiguy yahoo.com> writes:
On 5/17/15 5:15 AM, Dennis Ritchie wrote:
 This option is also a strange:

 char[][] s = ["foo".dup, "bar".dup];
 s[1][1] = 't';

 In my opinion, you need to add to D keyword mutable.
It's annoying to have to dup each one. But, you do have a couple other possibilities: auto s = ["foo".dup, "bar".dup]; import std.algorithm : map; import std.array : array; auto s = map!(a => a.dup)(["foo", "bar"]).array; // this will needlessly allocate an array for the strings But really, a string is immutable. There's not a way around that. A string is the most basic level of array primitive, not even mutable arrays of non-char types have that, and it's an annoyance. From there, you have to build the data out of ROM into the heap. -Steve
May 18 2015
parent reply "Dennis Ritchie" <dennis.ritchie mail.ru> writes:
On Monday, 18 May 2015 at 13:14:38 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer 
wrote:
 It's annoying to have to dup each one.
Yes, it's really annoying. However, the problem can be solved as follows: http://forum.dlang.org/thread/owxweucyzjwugpjwhwdu forum.dlang.org?page=2#post-cqjevoldkqdkmdbenkul:40forum.dlang.org On Monday, 18 May 2015 at 13:14:38 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
 But, you do have a couple other possibilities:

 auto s = ["foo".dup, "bar".dup];

 import std.algorithm : map;
 import std.array : array;
 auto s = map!(a => a.dup)(["foo", "bar"]).array; // this will 
 needlessly allocate an array for the strings
Now imagine that you have a multi-dimensional array of strings. This will not work: auto s = map!(a => a.dup)([["foo", "baz"], ["bar", "test"]]).array; You have to apply to each line .dup :) auto s = [["foo".dup, "baz".dup], ["bar".dup, "test".dup]]; s[1][0][1] = 't'; On Monday, 18 May 2015 at 13:14:38 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
 But really, a string is immutable. There's not a way around 
 that. A string is the most basic level of array primitive, not 
 even mutable arrays of non-char types have that, and it's an 
 annoyance. From there, you have to build the data out of ROM 
 into the heap.
Thank you. I do not know. And yet, the problem is easily solved. You just have to add .deepDup Phobos: http://forum.dlang.org/thread/owxweucyzjwugpjwhwdu forum.dlang.org?page=2#post-cqjevoldkqdkmdbenkul:40forum.dlang.org
May 18 2015
parent reply Steven Schveighoffer <schveiguy yahoo.com> writes:
On 5/18/15 9:55 AM, Dennis Ritchie wrote:
 On Monday, 18 May 2015 at 13:14:38 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
 It's annoying to have to dup each one.
Yes, it's really annoying. However, the problem can be solved as follows: http://forum.dlang.org/thread/owxweucyzjwugpjwhwdu forum.dlang.org?page=2#post-cqjevoldkqdkmdbenkul:40forum.dlang.org On Monday, 18 May 2015 at 13:14:38 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
 But, you do have a couple other possibilities:

 auto s = ["foo".dup, "bar".dup];

 import std.algorithm : map;
 import std.array : array;
 auto s = map!(a => a.dup)(["foo", "bar"]).array; // this will
 needlessly allocate an array for the strings
Now imagine that you have a multi-dimensional array of strings. This will not work: auto s = map!(a => a.dup)([["foo", "baz"], ["bar", "test"]]).array;
Right, you'd apply the map/array combo to each element: alias m = map!(a => a.dup); // too bad can't do array as well auto s = [m(["foo", "baz"]).array, m(["bar", "test"]).array]; Or to get even more crazy: auto s = map!(a => map!(a => a.dup)(a).array)(/* your input array */).array; But this means you are duping more of the array literal than you really should. It's likely helpful to have somewhere in std.array a dupArray function that does map!(a => a.dup).array work in one go (and without making a temporary array): auto s = [dupArray("foo", "baz"), dupArray("bar", "test")];
 On Monday, 18 May 2015 at 13:14:38 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
 But really, a string is immutable. There's not a way around that. A
 string is the most basic level of array primitive, not even mutable
 arrays of non-char types have that, and it's an annoyance. From there,
 you have to build the data out of ROM into the heap.
Thank you. I do not know. And yet, the problem is easily solved. You just have to add ..deepDup Phobos: http://forum.dlang.org/thread/owxweucyzjwugpjwhwdu forum.dlang.org?page=2#post-cqjevoldkqdkmdbenkul:40forum.dlang.org
deepDup would dup the whole thing. All you need to dup is the string literals, as array literals constructed at runtime are on the heap (and mutable) already. The literal already is wasted even in my original suggestion, but this is doubly wasteful. -Steve
May 18 2015
parent "Dennis Ritchie" <dennis.ritchie mail.ru> writes:
On Monday, 18 May 2015 at 14:43:33 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer 
wrote:
 Right, you'd apply the map/array combo to each element:
Yes, I knew it.
 alias m = map!(a => a.dup); // too bad can't do array as well

 auto s = [m(["foo", "baz"]).array, m(["bar", "test"]).array];

 Or to get even more crazy:

 auto s = map!(a => map!(a => a.dup)(a).array)(/* your input 
 array */).array;
Imagine a five-dimensional array will be :)
 But this means you are duping more of the array literal than 
 you really should.

 It's likely helpful to have somewhere in std.array a dupArray 
 function that does map!(a => a.dup).array work in one go (and 
 without making a temporary array):

 auto s = [dupArray("foo", "baz"), dupArray("bar", "test")];
Yes, it would be nice. I believe that Phobos need such function.
 deepDup would dup the whole thing. All you need to dup is the 
 string literals, as array literals constructed at runtime are 
 on the heap (and mutable) already. The literal already is 
 wasted even in my original suggestion, but this is doubly 
 wasteful.
Right.
May 18 2015
prev sibling parent "Jack Applegame" <japplegame gmail.com> writes:
On Sunday, 17 May 2015 at 09:10:06 UTC, Dennis Ritchie wrote:
 It's uncomfortable:
 -----
 char[][] s = [['f', 'o', 'o'], ['b', 'a', 'r']];
 s[1][1] = 't';
auto s = ["foo".dup, "bar".dup]; s[1][1] = 't';
May 17 2015
prev sibling next sibling parent Daniel Kozak via Digitalmars-d-learn <digitalmars-d-learn puremagic.com> writes:
On Sun, 17 May 2015 09:06:38 +0000
Dennis Ritchie via Digitalmars-d-learn <digitalmars-d-learn puremagic.com>
wrote:

 Hi,
 It seems to me, or D do not create mutable array of strings?
 
 How to create a mutable equivalent of a string array?
 
 -----
 string[] s = ["foo", "bar"];
 // s[1][1] = 't'; // immutable expression s[1][1]
auto s = ["foo".dup, "bar".dup];
May 17 2015
prev sibling parent reply Daniel Kozak via Digitalmars-d-learn <digitalmars-d-learn puremagic.com> writes:
On Sun, 17 May 2015 09:06:38 +0000
Dennis Ritchie via Digitalmars-d-learn <digitalmars-d-learn puremagic.com>
wrote:

 Hi,
 It seems to me, or D do not create mutable array of strings?
 
 How to create a mutable equivalent of a string array?
 
 -----
 string[] s = ["foo", "bar"];
 // s[1][1] = 't'; // immutable expression s[1][1]
or you can use cast if you are sure thats what you really need: auto s = [cast(char[])"foo", cast(char[])"bar"]; or auto s = cast(char[][])["foo", "bar"];
May 17 2015
next sibling parent reply "Dennis Ritchie" <dennis.ritchie mail.ru> writes:
On Sunday, 17 May 2015 at 09:18:15 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
 auto s = cast(char[][])["foo", "bar"];
Thanks. This version I was completely satisfied.
May 17 2015
next sibling parent reply "anonymous" <anonymous example.com> writes:
On Sunday, 17 May 2015 at 09:20:17 UTC, Dennis Ritchie wrote:
 On Sunday, 17 May 2015 at 09:18:15 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
 auto s = cast(char[][])["foo", "bar"];
Thanks. This version I was completely satisfied.
Remember that Daniel Kozak wrote "if you are sure thats what you really need". I'm confident that you're not sure it's what you need. For starters, this crashes on linux: ---- auto s = cast(char[][])["foo", "bar"]; s[1][1] = 't'; ----
May 17 2015
parent reply "Dennis Ritchie" <dennis.ritchie mail.ru> writes:
On Sunday, 17 May 2015 at 09:24:19 UTC, anonymous wrote:
 On Sunday, 17 May 2015 at 09:20:17 UTC, Dennis Ritchie wrote:
 On Sunday, 17 May 2015 at 09:18:15 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
 auto s = cast(char[][])["foo", "bar"];
Thanks. This version I was completely satisfied.
Remember that Daniel Kozak wrote "if you are sure thats what you really need". I'm confident that you're not sure it's what you need. For starters, this crashes on linux: ---- auto s = cast(char[][])["foo", "bar"]; s[1][1] = 't'; ----
And no crashes on Windows :)
May 17 2015
parent reply "anonymous" <anonymous example.com> writes:
On Sunday, 17 May 2015 at 09:26:15 UTC, Dennis Ritchie wrote:
 And no crashes on Windows :)
Yeah, on windows it's even worse. void main() { auto s = cast(char[][])["foo", "bar"]; s[1][1] = 't'; import std.stdio; writeln("bar"); }
May 17 2015
parent "Dennis Ritchie" <dennis.ritchie mail.ru> writes:
On Sunday, 17 May 2015 at 09:36:33 UTC, anonymous wrote:
 On Sunday, 17 May 2015 at 09:26:15 UTC, Dennis Ritchie wrote:
 And no crashes on Windows :)
Yeah, on windows it's even worse. void main() { auto s = cast(char[][])["foo", "bar"]; s[1][1] = 't'; import std.stdio; writeln("bar"); }
Yes exactly.
May 17 2015
prev sibling parent reply "Daniel Kozak" <kozzi11 gmail.com> writes:
On Sunday, 17 May 2015 at 09:20:17 UTC, Dennis Ritchie wrote:
 On Sunday, 17 May 2015 at 09:18:15 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
 auto s = cast(char[][])["foo", "bar"];
Thanks. This version I was completely satisfied.
So maybe this one would be ok with you too :) auto s = to!(char[][])(["foo", "bar"]);
May 17 2015
parent "Dennis Ritchie" <dennis.ritchie mail.ru> writes:
On Sunday, 17 May 2015 at 09:37:56 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
 So maybe this one would be ok with you too :)

 auto s = to!(char[][])(["foo", "bar"]);
Now it works :)
May 17 2015
prev sibling next sibling parent reply "Marc =?UTF-8?B?U2Now7x0eiI=?= <schuetzm gmx.net> writes:
On Sunday, 17 May 2015 at 09:18:15 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
 On Sun, 17 May 2015 09:06:38 +0000
 Dennis Ritchie via Digitalmars-d-learn 
 <digitalmars-d-learn puremagic.com>
 wrote:

 Hi,
 It seems to me, or D do not create mutable array of strings?
 
 How to create a mutable equivalent of a string array?
 
 -----
 string[] s = ["foo", "bar"];
 // s[1][1] = 't'; // immutable expression s[1][1]
or you can use cast if you are sure thats what you really need: auto s = [cast(char[])"foo", cast(char[])"bar"]; or auto s = cast(char[][])["foo", "bar"];
That's not a good idea. I haven't checked, but this will likely segfault on mutation, because the string literals are placed into read-only memory. And multiple identical strings are merged (shared), so that this would modify all occurances of that string literal, even if it shouldn't segfault.
May 17 2015
parent reply "Daniel Kozak" <kozzi11 gmail.com> writes:
On Sunday, 17 May 2015 at 09:21:58 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
 On Sunday, 17 May 2015 at 09:18:15 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
 On Sun, 17 May 2015 09:06:38 +0000
 Dennis Ritchie via Digitalmars-d-learn 
 <digitalmars-d-learn puremagic.com>
 wrote:

 Hi,
 It seems to me, or D do not create mutable array of strings?
 
 How to create a mutable equivalent of a string array?
 
 -----
 string[] s = ["foo", "bar"];
 // s[1][1] = 't'; // immutable expression s[1][1]
or you can use cast if you are sure thats what you really need: auto s = [cast(char[])"foo", cast(char[])"bar"]; or auto s = cast(char[][])["foo", "bar"];
That's not a good idea. I haven't checked, but this will likely segfault on mutation
Yep, you are right, shame on me :)
May 17 2015
parent reply "Dennis Ritchie" <dennis.ritchie mail.ru> writes:
I remembered code Ali Çereli. It really helped:
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/ulhtlyxxclihaseefrot forum.dlang.org#post-mihl6m:241che:241:40digitalmars.com

-----
import std.stdio, std.traits, std.range, std.algorithm;

auto deepDup(A)(A arr)
	if (isArray!A)
{
	static if (isArray!(ElementType!A)) {
		return arr.map!(a => a.deepDup).array;
		
	} else {
		return arr.dup;
	}
}

void main() {

	auto s = ["foo", "bar"].deepDup;

	s[1][1] = 't';

	writeln(s);
}
-----
http://rextester.com/QBFH12695

P.S. Need to enable deepDup in Phobos.
May 17 2015
parent reply Daniel Kozak via Digitalmars-d-learn <digitalmars-d-learn puremagic.com> writes:
On Sun, 17 May 2015 09:39:21 +0000
Dennis Ritchie via Digitalmars-d-learn <digitalmars-d-learn puremagic.com>
wrote:

 I remembered code Ali Çereli. It really helped:
 http://forum.dlang.org/thread/ulhtlyxxclihaseefrot forum.dlang.org#post-mihl6m:241che:241:40digitalmars.com
 
 -----
 import std.stdio, std.traits, std.range, std.algorithm;
 
 auto deepDup(A)(A arr)
 	if (isArray!A)
 {
 	static if (isArray!(ElementType!A)) {
 		return arr.map!(a => a.deepDup).array;
 		
 	} else {
 		return arr.dup;
 	}
 }
 
 void main() {
 
 	auto s = ["foo", "bar"].deepDup;
 
 	s[1][1] = 't';
 
 	writeln(s);
 }
 -----
 http://rextester.com/QBFH12695
 
 P.S. Need to enable deepDup in Phobos.
allready there: auto s = ["foo", "bar"].map!"a.dup".array; :)
May 17 2015
parent reply "Daniel Kozak" <kozzi11 gmail.com> writes:
On Sunday, 17 May 2015 at 09:57:05 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
 On Sun, 17 May 2015 09:39:21 +0000
 Dennis Ritchie via Digitalmars-d-learn 
 <digitalmars-d-learn puremagic.com>
 wrote:

 I remembered code Ali Çereli. It really helped:
 http://forum.dlang.org/thread/ulhtlyxxclihaseefrot forum.dlang.org#post-mihl6m:241che:241:40digitalmars.com
 
 -----
 import std.stdio, std.traits, std.range, std.algorithm;
 
 auto deepDup(A)(A arr)
 	if (isArray!A)
 {
 	static if (isArray!(ElementType!A)) {
 		return arr.map!(a => a.deepDup).array;
 		
 	} else {
 		return arr.dup;
 	}
 }
 
 void main() {
 
 	auto s = ["foo", "bar"].deepDup;
 
 	s[1][1] = 't';
 
 	writeln(s);
 }
 -----
 http://rextester.com/QBFH12695
 
 P.S. Need to enable deepDup in Phobos.
allready there: auto s = ["foo", "bar"].map!"a.dup".array; :)
Ouch ignore this one :D
May 17 2015
parent "Dennis Ritchie" <dennis.ritchie mail.ru> writes:
On Sunday, 17 May 2015 at 10:05:34 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
 Ouch ignore this one :D
Yes, it will not work with multidimensional arrays :)
May 17 2015
prev sibling parent "Daniel Kozak" <kozzi11 gmail.com> writes:
On Sunday, 17 May 2015 at 09:18:15 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
 On Sun, 17 May 2015 09:06:38 +0000
 Dennis Ritchie via Digitalmars-d-learn 
 <digitalmars-d-learn puremagic.com>
 wrote:

 Hi,
 It seems to me, or D do not create mutable array of strings?
 
 How to create a mutable equivalent of a string array?
 
 -----
 string[] s = ["foo", "bar"];
 // s[1][1] = 't'; // immutable expression s[1][1]
or you can use cast if you are sure thats what you really need: auto s = [cast(char[])"foo", cast(char[])"bar"]; or auto s = cast(char[][])["foo", "bar"];
But I am unsure if this will work in case where immutable data will occupied read only memory.
May 17 2015