• "Per =?UTF-8?B?Tm9yZGzDtnci?= <per.nordlow gmail.com> (7/7) Jul 06 2015 Have anybody used the FFMPEG bindings at
• ketmar (4/5) Jul 06 2015 don't know, but various players stop bundling ffmpeg long time ago. i=20
• ketmar (2/2) Jul 06 2015 p.s. "stop bundling" means "stop bundling their own private versions in=...
• "Per =?UTF-8?B?Tm9yZGzDtnci?= <per.nordlow gmail.com> (2/6) Jul 07 2015 Ok, thanks.

"Per =?UTF-8?B?Tm9yZGzDtnci?= <per.nordlow gmail.com> writes:

Have anybody used the FFMPEG bindings at

https://bitbucket.org/sumitraja/ffmpeg-d

?

Specifically do I have to check for a specific version of the 
libraries to stay in sync with the version bindings?

How stable has the FFMPEG API since beginning 2015?

What's the policy on future API breaking Changes?

ketmar <ketmar ketmar.no-ip.org> writes:

On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 16:42:08 +0000, Per Nordl=C3=B6w wrote:

 How stable has the FFMPEG API since beginning 2015?

don't know, but various players stop bundling ffmpeg long time ago. i=20
assume that API is stable enough to stop worrying about it.

warning. information deduced, but not checked.=

ketmar <ketmar ketmar.no-ip.org> writes:

p.s. "stop bundling" means "stop bundling their own private versions in=20
source tree, and started to use system version" here.=

"Per =?UTF-8?B?Tm9yZGzDtnci?= <per.nordlow gmail.com> writes:

On Tuesday, 7 July 2015 at 03:05:11 UTC, ketmar wrote:
 How stable has the FFMPEG API since beginning 2015?

 don't know, but various players stop bundling ffmpeg long time 
 ago. i assume that API is stable enough to stop worrying about 
 it.

Ok, thanks.