• simendsjo (6/6) Jul 26 2011 I've just added "default: assert(0)" on the switches, but I got an error...
• bearophile (5/7) Jul 26 2011 See:
• Jesse Phillips (2/10) Jul 26 2011 I just made a pull request to fix this in the unofficial repo. But Bearo...
• Jesse Phillips (2/3) Jul 26 2011 Forgot to give you the quick link: https://github.com/Rayerd/dfl/pull/3
• simendsjo (3/6) Jul 26 2011 !? Now I'm a bit lost. It says that repo is unofficial. The SVN repo
• Jesse Phillips (8/18) Jul 26 2011 The author is maintaining it. But there was a good time while it didn't
• simendsjo (5/23) Jul 27 2011 I agree github is a much better collaboration platform than dsource+svn,...
• simendsjo (4/31) Jul 27 2011 Worked great, thanks!
• Jesse Phillips (2/8) Jul 27 2011 I'm pretty sure I contacted him to find out what to do with my ini updat...

simendsjo <simendsjo gmail.com> writes:

I've just added "default: assert(0)" on the switches, but I got an error 
I don't know how to solve:

tabcontrol.d(18): Error: class dfl.tabcontrol.TabPage use of 
dfl.control.Control.opEquals(Control ctrl) hidden by TabPage is deprecated

Any ideas? The best would of course be if the maintainer fixes the 
issues, but I don't know how long this will be.

bearophile <bearophileHUGS lycos.com> writes:

simendsjo:

 I've just added "default: assert(0)" on the switches, but I got an error 
 I don't know how to solve:

See:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6373

Bye,
bearophile

Jesse Phillips <jessekphillips+D gmail.com> writes:

simendsjo Wrote:

 I've just added "default: assert(0)" on the switches, but I got an error 
 I don't know how to solve:
 
 tabcontrol.d(18): Error: class dfl.tabcontrol.TabPage use of 
 dfl.control.Control.opEquals(Control ctrl) hidden by TabPage is deprecated
 
 Any ideas? The best would of course be if the maintainer fixes the 
 issues, but I don't know how long this will be.

I just made a pull request to fix this in the unofficial repo. But Bearophile's
alias is probably the correct solution.

Jesse Phillips <jessekphillips+D gmail.com> writes:

Jesse Phillips Wrote:

 I just made a pull request to fix this in the unofficial repo. But
Bearophile's alias is probably the correct solution.

Forgot to give you the quick link: https://github.com/Rayerd/dfl/pull/3

simendsjo <simendsjo gmail.com> writes:

On 26.07.2011 20:49, Jesse Phillips wrote:
 Jesse Phillips Wrote:

 I just made a pull request to fix this in the unofficial repo. But
Bearophile's alias is probably the correct solution.

 Forgot to give you the quick link: https://github.com/Rayerd/dfl/pull/3

!? Now I'm a bit lost. It says that repo is unofficial. The SVN repo 
seems alive as it was last updated a couple of months ago.

Jesse Phillips <jessekphillips+d gmail.com> writes:

On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 22:22:39 +0200, simendsjo wrote:

 On 26.07.2011 20:49, Jesse Phillips wrote:
 Jesse Phillips Wrote:

 I just made a pull request to fix this in the unofficial repo. But
 Bearophile's alias is probably the correct solution.

 Forgot to give you the quick link: https://github.com/Rayerd/dfl/pull/3

 
 !? Now I'm a bit lost. It says that repo is unofficial. The SVN repo
 seems alive as it was last updated a couple of months ago.

The author is maintaining it. But there was a good time while it didn't 
compile with the latest and so a published fix was made.

As to whether there was an attempted patch submission, I don't know. But 
I'm going with github because it is damn easy to contribute, and 
publicize work sooner than a review process allows.

It would be interesting if Christopher forked his project and continued 
working from github (its not like he doesn't get the credit).

simendsjo <simendsjo gmail.com> writes:

On 27.07.2011 03:30, Jesse Phillips wrote:
 On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 22:22:39 +0200, simendsjo wrote:

 On 26.07.2011 20:49, Jesse Phillips wrote:
 Jesse Phillips Wrote:

 I just made a pull request to fix this in the unofficial repo. But
 Bearophile's alias is probably the correct solution.

 Forgot to give you the quick link: https://github.com/Rayerd/dfl/pull/3

 !? Now I'm a bit lost. It says that repo is unofficial. The SVN repo
 seems alive as it was last updated a couple of months ago.

 The author is maintaining it. But there was a good time while it didn't
 compile with the latest and so a published fix was made.

 As to whether there was an attempted patch submission, I don't know. But
 I'm going with github because it is damn easy to contribute, and
 publicize work sooner than a review process allows.

 It would be interesting if Christopher forked his project and continued
 working from github (its not like he doesn't get the credit).

I agree github is a much better collaboration platform than dsource+svn, 
but C.Miller should at least be contacted. It's bad for a project to get 
fragmented if it doesn't have to be.

Off to try the github version then.

simendsjo <simendsjo gmail.com> writes:

On 27.07.2011 09:47, simendsjo wrote:
 On 27.07.2011 03:30, Jesse Phillips wrote:
 On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 22:22:39 +0200, simendsjo wrote:

 On 26.07.2011 20:49, Jesse Phillips wrote:
 Jesse Phillips Wrote:

 I just made a pull request to fix this in the unofficial repo. But
 Bearophile's alias is probably the correct solution.

 Forgot to give you the quick link: https://github.com/Rayerd/dfl/pull/3

 !? Now I'm a bit lost. It says that repo is unofficial. The SVN repo
 seems alive as it was last updated a couple of months ago.

 The author is maintaining it. But there was a good time while it didn't
 compile with the latest and so a published fix was made.

 As to whether there was an attempted patch submission, I don't know. But
 I'm going with github because it is damn easy to contribute, and
 publicize work sooner than a review process allows.

 It would be interesting if Christopher forked his project and continued
 working from github (its not like he doesn't get the credit).

 I agree github is a much better collaboration platform than dsource+svn,
 but C.Miller should at least be contacted. It's bad for a project to get
 fragmented if it doesn't have to be.

 Off to try the github version then.

Worked great, thanks!
And yes, github is better. I removed the warnings and added a pull 
request. Go github.

Jesse Phillips <jessekphillips+D gmail.com> writes:

simendsjo Wrote:

 I agree github is a much better collaboration platform than dsource+svn, 
 but C.Miller should at least be contacted. It's bad for a project to get 
 fragmented if it doesn't have to be.
 
 Off to try the github version then.
 

I'm pretty sure I contacted him to find out what to do with my ini updates, but
never heard from him, but I used his contact form and so don't have a record of
it or know if it went through.