digitalmars.D.learn - Does the compiler always semantically analyze everything in a
- Marco Leise (7/7) Nov 13 2014 Specifically, when I put some code in a separately compiled
- Dicebot (2/2) Nov 13 2014 Apart from unused templates - yes. In abscence of .di files
- Marco Leise (12/14) Nov 13 2014 I thought so and wonder how that will scale with large code
Specifically, when I put some code in a separately compiled lib, does that save me anything in terms of files that have to be analyzed or will dmd always go through every file that can be reached through includes ? (.di files are out of question, because they have issues) -- Marco
Nov 13 2014
Apart from unused templates - yes. In abscence of .di files separate compilation only affects generated object files
Nov 13 2014
Am Thu, 13 Nov 2014 16:54:45 +0000 schrieb "Dicebot" <public dicebot.lv>:Apart from unused templates - yes. In abscence of .di files separate compilation only affects generated object filesI thought so and wonder how that will scale with large code bases. Lately I found so many bugs and shortcomings that the ice is growing thin. There's bugs with .di files, with separate compilation, with SIMD, static dtors inside templates... and no the uncertainty how D projects will scale if the module with main imports the world. It makes me want to switch to C++. :p I hope Walter's idea of full lazy evaluation can help here. -- Marco
Nov 13 2014