• =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Alex_R=F8nne_Petersen?= (4/4) Mar 13 2012 What the title says. It seems that core.sync.mutex does, but not sure
• Steven Schveighoffer (7/9) Mar 14 2012 =
• =?UTF-8?B?QWxleCBSw7hubmUgUGV0ZXJzZW4=?= (6/13) Mar 14 2012 From experience, trusting tests when it comes to anything related to

=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Alex_R=F8nne_Petersen?= <xtzgzorex gmail.com> writes:

What the title says. It seems that core.sync.mutex does, but not sure 
about the synchronized statement.

-- 
- Alex

"Steven Schveighoffer" <schveiguy yahoo.com> writes:

On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 16:26:08 -0400, Alex R=C3=B8nne Petersen  =

<xtzgzorex gmail.com> wrote:

 What the title says. It seems that core.sync.mutex does, but not sure =

 =

 about the synchronized statement.

Yes.  A simple test would have shown you that ;)  But it would be good t=
o  =

put this in the docs.

-Steve

=?UTF-8?B?QWxleCBSw7hubmUgUGV0ZXJzZW4=?= <xtzgzorex gmail.com> writes:

On 14-03-2012 13:24, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
 On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 16:26:08 -0400, Alex Rønne Petersen
 <xtzgzorex gmail.com> wrote:

 What the title says. It seems that core.sync.mutex does, but not sure
 about the synchronized statement.

 Yes. A simple test would have shown you that ;) But it would be good to
 put this in the docs.

 -Steve

 From experience, trusting tests when it comes to anything related to 
threads tends to be a bad idea, so I figured it'd be better to ask. :)

I'll see about updating the docs.

-- 
- Alex