• Manfred Nowak (4/5) May 15 2015 1) How to know when this will indeed be deprecated?
• Steven Schveighoffer (7/11) May 15 2015 That seems like a bug.
• Manfred Nowak (3/4) May 15 2015 https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14589

Manfred Nowak <svv1999 hotmail.com> writes:

 Deprecation: super is not an lvalue

1) How to know when this will indeed be deprecated?
2) What does it mean, when `super++' is signalled as depracation, but 
`super+=' is not signalled?

-manfred

Steven Schveighoffer <schveiguy yahoo.com> writes:

On 5/15/15 12:50 PM, Manfred Nowak wrote:
 Deprecation: super is not an lvalue

 1) How to know when this will indeed be deprecated?
 2) What does it mean, when `super++' is signalled as depracation, but
 `super+=' is not signalled?

That seems like a bug.

I think super being an lvalue in this context simply means that the 
*reference* is not an lvalue (e.g. you can't do super = 
someOtherObject), not the object it points at.

Clearly anything that is passed by reference is an lvalue.

-Steve

Manfred Nowak <svv1999 hotmail.com> writes:

Steven Schveighoffer wrote:

 That seems like a bug.

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14589

-manfred