• JS (1/1) Aug 03 2013 There has to be a better way?!?!?!?!
• JS (3/4) Aug 03 2013 Of course, I mean string mixin's using template.. and the
• Bosak (10/14) Aug 03 2013 I usually write unittests that print the result of the template

"JS" <js.mdnq gmail.com> writes:

There has to be a better way?!?!?!?!

"JS" <js.mdnq gmail.com> writes:

On Saturday, 3 August 2013 at 14:04:10 UTC, JS wrote:
 There has to be a better way?!?!?!?!

Of course, I mean string mixin's using template.. and the 
statement was to ask people how they went about it...

"Bosak" <bosak gmail.com> writes:

On Saturday, 3 August 2013 at 14:35:52 UTC, JS wrote:
 On Saturday, 3 August 2013 at 14:04:10 UTC, JS wrote:
 There has to be a better way?!?!?!?!

 Of course, I mean string mixin's using template.. and the 
 statement was to ask people how they went about it...

I usually write unittests that print the result of the template 
to the console to see if everything generates properly. So 
instead of:

mixin(Templ!(someArgs));

I write unittest:

unittest {
     import std.stdio;
     writeln(Templ!(sampleArgs));
}