• ponce (3/3) Aug 25 2014 Is there a way to have cross-module inlining but with separate
• ketmar via Digitalmars-d-learn (5/8) Aug 25 2014 i think that turning your functions into templates should do the trick.
• hane (4/14) Aug 25 2014 No template hack needed now.
• ketmar via Digitalmars-d-learn (3/4) Aug 25 2014 unless you using gdc, for example. ;-)

"ponce" <contact gam3sfrommars.fr> writes:

Is there a way to have cross-module inlining but with separate 
compilation?
Like with link-time generation in C++ compilers.

ketmar via Digitalmars-d-learn <digitalmars-d-learn puremagic.com> writes:

On Mon, 25 Aug 2014 21:07:06 +0000
ponce via Digitalmars-d-learn <digitalmars-d-learn puremagic.com> wrote:

 Is there a way to have cross-module inlining but with separate=20
 compilation?
 Like with link-time generation in C++ compilers.

i think that turning your functions into templates should do the trick.
i.e. int myfunc (int  n) --> int myfunc() (int n).

but this is a hack, of course.

"hane" <han.ehit.suzi.0 gmail.com> writes:

On Tuesday, 26 August 2014 at 04:34:39 UTC, ketmar via 
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
 On Mon, 25 Aug 2014 21:07:06 +0000
 ponce via Digitalmars-d-learn 
 <digitalmars-d-learn puremagic.com> wrote:

 Is there a way to have cross-module inlining but with separate 
 compilation?
 Like with link-time generation in C++ compilers.

 i think that turning your functions into templates should do 
 the trick.
 i.e. int myfunc (int  n) --> int myfunc() (int n).

 but this is a hack, of course.

No template hack needed now.
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985

ketmar via Digitalmars-d-learn <digitalmars-d-learn puremagic.com> writes:

On Tue, 26 Aug 2014 04:49:17 +0000
hane via Digitalmars-d-learn <digitalmars-d-learn puremagic.com> wrote:

 No template hack needed now.

unless you using gdc, for example. ;-)