• =?UTF-8?B?Tm9yZGzDtnc=?= (8/8) Dec 09 2015 Is it currently possible for a container such as
• =?UTF-8?B?Tm9yZGzDtnc=?= (2/3) Dec 09 2015 Correction: I mean std.experimental.allocator
• Kagamin (2/2) Dec 09 2015 Allocators usually use global state. Such code is usually treated
• =?UTF-8?B?Tm9yZGzDtnc=?= (4/6) Dec 09 2015 What about containers that store their own local allocator? Will

=?UTF-8?B?Tm9yZGzDtnc=?= <per.nordlow gmail.com> writes:

Is it currently possible for a container such as

https://github.com/economicmodeling/containers/blob/master/src/containers/dynamicarray.d

that uses std.experimental.container

to be completely pure? If not can be made to?

I wonder because only length(), empty(), front() and back() are 
tagged as pure in DynamicArray at

https://github.com/economicmodeling/containers/blob/master/src/containers/dynamicarray.d

are marked as pure. Is there a reason for this?

=?UTF-8?B?Tm9yZGzDtnc=?= <per.nordlow gmail.com> writes:

On Wednesday, 9 December 2015 at 10:47:18 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
 that uses std.experimental.container

Correction: I mean std.experimental.allocator

Kagamin <spam here.lot> writes:

Allocators usually use global state. Such code is usually treated 
as impure.

=?UTF-8?B?Tm9yZGzDtnc=?= <per.nordlow gmail.com> writes:

On Wednesday, 9 December 2015 at 11:46:45 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
 Allocators usually use global state. Such code is usually 
 treated as impure.

What about containers that store their own local allocator? Will 
DMD infer all members of such containers to be pure if they only 
access locally allocated structures?