• Callum Anderson (10/10) Aug 10 2011 Hi,
• Jonathan M Davis (8/19) Aug 11 2011 SIGSEV is a signal, not an exception. No exception handling code will do...
• Callum Anderson (6/6) Aug 11 2011 Thanks,
• Jonathan M Davis (5/11) Aug 11 2011 I really don't know what happens with C++ exceptions that get thrown whe...
• Russel Winder (22/33) Aug 11 2011 the=20
• Callum Anderson (3/3) Aug 11 2011 Ok thanks for the help, wasn't sure if I was missing something obvious.

Callum Anderson <callumenator gmail.com> writes:

Hi,

Is there any way to catch unhandled exceptions thrown by external libraries? I
am
calling an external C library function, which works fine in release mode,
however
in debug mode it throws a SIGSEV. I would like to debug later parts of the code,
but can;t get past this function when debugging because of the exception.

I have tried putting the function call in try/catch, tried a scope(failure) and
tried collectException() from std.exception. Is it possible to catch these
exceptions?

Thanks alot,
Callum

Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg gmx.com> writes:

On Thursday, August 11, 2011 06:53:57 Callum Anderson wrote:
 Hi,
 
 Is there any way to catch unhandled exceptions thrown by external libraries?
 I am calling an external C library function, which works fine in release
 mode, however in debug mode it throws a SIGSEV. I would like to debug later
 parts of the code, but can;t get past this function when debugging because
 of the exception.
 
 I have tried putting the function call in try/catch, tried a scope(failure)
 and tried collectException() from std.exception. Is it possible to catch
 these exceptions?

SIGSEV is a signal, not an exception. No exception handling code will do 
anything with it. And pure c code _can't_ throw exceptions of any kind, 
because C has no exceptions (it _might_ be possible for an exception to come 
out of C code which called code from another language which _does_ have 
ecxeptions, but I'm not sure). If you want to handle SIGSEGV, you need a use a 
signal handler.

- Jonathan M Davis

Callum Anderson <callumenator gmail.com> writes:

Thanks,
SIGSEGV was a brain malfunction on my part sorry. The error was SIG Unhandled
Exception. And I should have said I was calling a C-Api layer on a C++ library.
Does that change anything?
Thanks again,
Callum

Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg gmx.com> writes:

On Thursday, August 11, 2011 07:29:35 Callum Anderson wrote:
 Thanks,
 SIGSEGV was a brain malfunction on my part sorry. The error was SIG
 Unhandled Exception. And I should have said I was calling a C-Api layer on
 a C++ library. Does that change anything?
 Thanks again,
 Callum

I really don't know what happens with C++ exceptions that get thrown when the 
C++ is wrapped in a C API. So, I can't really help you there. The best that I 
could do is google for it.

- Jonathan M Davis

Russel Winder <russel russel.org.uk> writes:

On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 00:42 -0700, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
 On Thursday, August 11, 2011 07:29:35 Callum Anderson wrote:
 Thanks,
 SIGSEGV was a brain malfunction on my part sorry. The error was SIG
 Unhandled Exception. And I should have said I was calling a C-Api layer=


 on
 a C++ library. Does that change anything?
 Thanks again,
 Callum

=20
 I really don't know what happens with C++ exceptions that get thrown when=

 the=20
 C++ is wrapped in a C API. So, I can't really help you there. The best th=

at I=20
 could do is google for it.

Join ACCU http://accu.org.  Get on their general mailing list.  Ask
there, and you'll either get an answer immediately or an answer will
emerge from the ensuing debate.  ACCU has a high percentage of very
highly knowledgeable and skilled C++ folk, including lots of people on
the standards committees.


but given it is an organization originally created from a merge of the C
User Group, and the European C++ user Group . . .

--=20
Russel.
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D
Dr Russel Winder      t: +44 20 7585 2200   voip: sip:russel.winder ekiga.n=
et
41 Buckmaster Road    m: +44 7770 465 077   xmpp: russel russel.org.uk
London SW11 1EN, UK   w: www.russel.org.uk  skype: russel_winder

Callum Anderson <callumenator gmail.com> writes:

Ok thanks for the help, wasn't sure if I was missing something obvious.
Cheers,
Callum