• Suliman (10/10) Apr 17 2017 I am writing lambda function. I need filter data at first step
• Suliman (4/4) Apr 17 2017 New question. Can I put result of filtering in itself without
• Stanislav Blinov (7/11) Apr 17 2017 No. filter is simply a wrapper around the source range, it does

Suliman <evermind live.ru> writes:

I am writing lambda function. I need filter data at first step 
and than do dome operation on them (for start simply print on the 
screen. I wrote next code:

MySQLTablesRange.filter!(a=>a[0].coerce!string.canFind("_")).each!(a =>
to!int(a[0].coerce!string.split("_")[1]).writeln);


But it's seem that each do not handle any data. I tested if data 
is corectly filtered and next code successfully print it's output.

auto t = 
MySQLTablesRange.array.filter!(a=>a[0].coerce!string.canFind("_"));
t.each!(a=>a[0].coerce!string.writeln);

But what is wrong with first code?

Suliman <evermind live.ru> writes:

New question. Can I put result of filtering in itself without 
creation of new variables like x:

auto x = 
MySQLTablesRange.array.filter!(a=>a[0].coerce!string.canFind("_"));

Stanislav Blinov <stanislav.blinov gmail.com> writes:

On Monday, 17 April 2017 at 10:02:22 UTC, Suliman wrote:
 New question. Can I put result of filtering in itself without 
 creation of new variables like x:

 auto x = 
 MySQLTablesRange.array.filter!(a=>a[0].coerce!string.canFind("_"));

No. filter is simply a wrapper around the source range, it does 
not modify it.

As for the problems you are having with ranges seeming empty, 
they are all due to the fact that the ResultRange in mysql-native 
isn't designed to support such chaining of calls. It's probably 
best to first exhaust a ResultRange and put it into an array.