digitalmars.D.learn - Bug or am I getting things wrong
- Q. Schroll (34/34) Jan 06 2016 In the listing below the commented line should do exactly the
- John Colvin (47/81) Jan 07 2016 Wow, that's a new reason to hate the comma operator even more
- =?UTF-8?Q?Ali_=c3=87ehreli?= (37/66) Jan 07 2016 I don't see any difference with dmd v2.069.2. Both lines print the
In the listing below the commented line should do exactly the same thing as the one above. /// DimArr!(i, T) ==> T[][]...[] i times. template DimArr(size_t i, T) { static if (i == 0) alias DimArr = T; else alias DimArr = DimArr!(i - 1, T)[]; } struct Array(T, size_t rk) if (rk > 1) { private size_t[rk] dims; /+ ... +/ auto toNestedArray() const { import std.range : iota; import std.format : format; enum dimsIndexed = `%(dims[%d]%|, %)`.format(dims.length.iota); auto result = mixin(`new DimArr!(rk, T)(` ~ dimsIndexed ~ `)`); // auto result = new DimArr!(rk, T)(mixin(dimsIndexed))); /+ ... +/ return result; } } The one above does exactly what I want, but the lower one only uses the last dimension for some reason. I found out by using these pragmas pragma(msg, "'", dimsIndexed, "'"); pragma(msg, ( new DimArr!(rk, T) ( mixin(dimsIndexed) ) ).stringof); Can someone please tell me what I'm getting wrong here, or is this a bug?
Jan 06 2016
On Thursday, 7 January 2016 at 07:51:05 UTC, Q. Schroll wrote:In the listing below the commented line should do exactly the same thing as the one above. /// DimArr!(i, T) ==> T[][]...[] i times. template DimArr(size_t i, T) { static if (i == 0) alias DimArr = T; else alias DimArr = DimArr!(i - 1, T)[]; } struct Array(T, size_t rk) if (rk > 1) { private size_t[rk] dims; /+ ... +/ auto toNestedArray() const { import std.range : iota; import std.format : format; enum dimsIndexed = `%(dims[%d]%|, %)`.format(dims.length.iota); auto result = mixin(`new DimArr!(rk, T)(` ~ dimsIndexed ~ `)`); // auto result = new DimArr!(rk, T)(mixin(dimsIndexed))); /+ ... +/ return result; } } The one above does exactly what I want, but the lower one only uses the last dimension for some reason. I found out by using these pragmas pragma(msg, "'", dimsIndexed, "'"); pragma(msg, ( new DimArr!(rk, T) ( mixin(dimsIndexed) ) ).stringof); Can someone please tell me what I'm getting wrong here, or is this a bug?Wow, that's a new reason to hate the comma operator even more than I did before! The expression that you are mixing in is actually a sequence of sub-expressions seperated by the comma operator, which means each expression is evaluated and the last one is returned. Remember, mixins are not textual substitution like C macros. Normally speaking you get error messages if you forget that, and that's ok, but here the evil comma operator made a mess of things. Here's one way to achieve what you want: /// DimArr!(i, T) ==> T[][]...[] i times. template DimArr(size_t i, T) { static if (i == 0) alias DimArr = T; else alias DimArr = DimArr!(i - 1, T)[]; } template Repeat(T, size_t N) { import std.meta : AliasSeq; static if (N == 0) alias Repeat = AliasSeq!(); else alias Repeat = AliasSeq!(T, Repeat!(T, N-1)); } auto toTuple(T, size_t N)(T[N] arr) { import std.typecons : Tuple; import std.traits : Unqual; Tuple!(Repeat!(Unqual!T, N)) tup; foreach(i, _; tup) tup[i] = arr[i]; return tup; } struct Array(T, size_t rk) if (rk > 1) { private size_t[rk] dims; /+ ... +/ auto toNestedArray() const { auto result = new DimArr!(rk, T)(dims.toTuple.expand); /+ ... +/ return result; } }
Jan 07 2016
On 01/06/2016 11:51 PM, Q. Schroll wrote:In the listing below the commented line should do exactly the same thing as the one above. /// DimArr!(i, T) ==> T[][]...[] i times. template DimArr(size_t i, T) { static if (i == 0) alias DimArr = T; else alias DimArr = DimArr!(i - 1, T)[]; } struct Array(T, size_t rk) if (rk > 1) { private size_t[rk] dims; /+ ... +/ auto toNestedArray() const { import std.range : iota; import std.format : format; enum dimsIndexed = `%(dims[%d]%|, %)`.format(dims.length.iota); auto result = mixin(`new DimArr!(rk, T)(` ~ dimsIndexed ~ `)`); // auto result = new DimArr!(rk, T)(mixin(dimsIndexed))); /+ ... +/ return result; } } The one above does exactly what I want, but the lower one only uses the last dimension for some reason. I found out by using these pragmas pragma(msg, "'", dimsIndexed, "'"); pragma(msg, ( new DimArr!(rk, T) ( mixin(dimsIndexed) ) ).stringof); Can someone please tell me what I'm getting wrong here, or is this a bug?I don't see any difference with dmd v2.069.2. Both lines print the following: 'dims[0], dims[1], dims[2], dims[3], dims[4], dims[5], dims[6], dims[7], dims[8], dims[9]' new int[][][][][][][][][][](this.dims[9]) Here is the program: /// DimArr!(i, T) ==> T[][]...[] i times. template DimArr(size_t i, T) { static if (i == 0) alias DimArr = T; else alias DimArr = DimArr!(i - 1, T)[]; } struct Array(T, size_t rk) if (rk > 1) { private size_t[rk] dims; /+ ... +/ auto toNestedArray() const { import std.range : iota; import std.format : format; enum dimsIndexed = `%(dims[%d]%|, %)`.format(dims.length.iota); auto result = mixin(`new DimArr!(rk, T)(` ~ dimsIndexed ~ `)`); // auto result = new DimArr!(rk, T)(mixin(dimsIndexed)); /+ ... +/ pragma(msg, "'", dimsIndexed, "'"); pragma(msg, ( new DimArr!(rk, T) ( mixin(dimsIndexed) ) ).stringof); return result; } } void main() { auto a = Array!(int, 10)(); import std.stdio; writeln(a.toNestedArray()); } Ali
Jan 07 2016