• ANtlord (8/8) Oct 17 2016 Hello! I've met an issue related to debugging by GDB. Directly
• ANtlord (5/13) Oct 17 2016 Oh Sorry, I've forgotten about pointing technical parameters.
• Basile B. (4/19) Oct 17 2016 redirect gdb's output to "ddemangle". This is what I do in the
• Basile B. (3/15) Oct 17 2016 seems to be:
• ANtlord (3/19) Oct 17 2016 This makes gdb useless. I can't type any command. Propably can I
• Martin Krejcirik (2/3) Oct 17 2016 Use latest GDB, 7.10 has got much better D support.
• ANtlord (3/6) Oct 17 2016 Tested on GDB 7.11.1. Same case :(
• Basile B. (2/9) Oct 17 2016 redirect to ddemangle, that's its job.
• ANtlord (4/6) Oct 20 2016 Do you know the way how to redirect? I've tried as you have

ANtlord <antlord92 gmail.com> writes:

Hello! I've met an issue related to debugging by GDB. Directly 
when I try to show call stack I get like this 
http://pastebin.com/kRFRqznq. How can I make name of methods more 
human readable?

I see part of printed name matches to name of methods from code 
and I can suppose what method was called, but it would be great 
if I can debug application without any supposing.

Sorry if my english is not clear.

ANtlord <antlord92 gmail.com> writes:

On Monday, 17 October 2016 at 15:43:32 UTC, ANtlord wrote:
 Hello! I've met an issue related to debugging by GDB. Directly 
 when I try to show call stack I get like this 
 http://pastebin.com/kRFRqznq. How can I make name of methods 
 more human readable?

 I see part of printed name matches to name of methods from code 
 and I can suppose what method was called, but it would be great 
 if I can debug application without any supposing.

 Sorry if my english is not clear.

Oh Sorry, I've forgotten about pointing technical parameters.

Ubuntu 14.04
GDB 7.7.1
DMD64 D Compiler v2.071.1

Basile B. <b2.temp gmx.com> writes:

On Monday, 17 October 2016 at 15:45:56 UTC, ANtlord wrote:
 On Monday, 17 October 2016 at 15:43:32 UTC, ANtlord wrote:
 Hello! I've met an issue related to debugging by GDB. Directly 
 when I try to show call stack I get like this 
 http://pastebin.com/kRFRqznq. How can I make name of methods 
 more human readable?

 I see part of printed name matches to name of methods from 
 code and I can suppose what method was called, but it would be 
 great if I can debug application without any supposing.

 Sorry if my english is not clear.

 Oh Sorry, I've forgotten about pointing technical parameters.

 Ubuntu 14.04
 GDB 7.7.1
 DMD64 D Compiler v2.071.1

redirect gdb's output to "ddemangle". This is what I do in the 
alpha version of Coedit's GDB commander, now in console mode I 
don't know the exact method.

Basile B. <b2.temp gmx.com> writes:

On Monday, 17 October 2016 at 17:46:05 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
 On Monday, 17 October 2016 at 15:45:56 UTC, ANtlord wrote:
 On Monday, 17 October 2016 at 15:43:32 UTC, ANtlord wrote:
 [...]

 Oh Sorry, I've forgotten about pointing technical parameters.

 Ubuntu 14.04
 GDB 7.7.1
 DMD64 D Compiler v2.071.1

 redirect gdb's output to "ddemangle". This is what I do in the 
 alpha version of Coedit's GDB commander, now in console mode I 
 don't know the exact method.

seems to be:

gdb binary_name | ddemangle

ANtlord <antlord92 gmail.com> writes:

On Monday, 17 October 2016 at 17:53:30 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
 On Monday, 17 October 2016 at 17:46:05 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
 On Monday, 17 October 2016 at 15:45:56 UTC, ANtlord wrote:
 On Monday, 17 October 2016 at 15:43:32 UTC, ANtlord wrote:
 [...]

 Oh Sorry, I've forgotten about pointing technical parameters.

 Ubuntu 14.04
 GDB 7.7.1
 DMD64 D Compiler v2.071.1

 redirect gdb's output to "ddemangle". This is what I do in the 
 alpha version of Coedit's GDB commander, now in console mode I 
 don't know the exact method.

 seems to be:

 gdb binary_name | ddemangle

This makes gdb useless. I can't type any command. Propably can I 
use demangle by another way?

Martin Krejcirik <mk-junk i-line.cz> writes:

On Monday, 17 October 2016 at 15:45:56 UTC, ANtlord wrote:
 GDB 7.7.1

Use latest GDB, 7.10 has got much better D support.

ANtlord <antlord92 gmail.com> writes:

On Monday, 17 October 2016 at 17:57:19 UTC, Martin Krejcirik 
wrote:
 On Monday, 17 October 2016 at 15:45:56 UTC, ANtlord wrote:
 GDB 7.7.1

 Use latest GDB, 7.10 has got much better D support.

Tested on GDB 7.11.1. Same case :(

Basile B. <b2.temp gmx.com> writes:

On Monday, 17 October 2016 at 19:14:49 UTC, ANtlord wrote:
 On Monday, 17 October 2016 at 17:57:19 UTC, Martin Krejcirik 
 wrote:
 On Monday, 17 October 2016 at 15:45:56 UTC, ANtlord wrote:
 GDB 7.7.1

 Use latest GDB, 7.10 has got much better D support.

 Tested on GDB 7.11.1. Same case :(

redirect to ddemangle, that's its job.

ANtlord <antlord92 gmail.com> writes:

On Monday, 17 October 2016 at 19:17:25 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
 On Monday, 17 October 2016 at 19:14:49 UTC, ANtlord wrote:
 redirect to ddemangle, that's its job.

Do you know the way how to redirect? I've tried as you have 
written above and this makes impossible to type any command to 
gdb.