• Max Samukha (27/27) Apr 23 2007 The output when compiling the code below is "1, 1" while it should be
• =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jari-Matti_M=E4kel=E4?= (19/23) Apr 23 2007 Yeah, something fishy is happening here (tested with dmd 1.013). This co...
• Max Samukha (3/26) Apr 24 2007 Thanks. I've posted this to bugzilla

Max Samukha <samukha voliacable.com> writes:

The output when compiling the code below is "1, 1" while it should be
"1, 2".  When 'names' declarations are commented out, the output is
correct.

import std.stdio;

template Foo(A...)
{
    static if (A.length > 3)
    {
        const char[] names = A[0] ~ ", " ~ Foo!(A[3..$]).names;
        const char[] values = A[1].stringof ~ ", " ~
Foo!(A[3..$]).values;
    }
    else
    {
        static assert(A.length == 3);

        const char[] names = A[0];
        const char[] values = A[1].stringof;
    }
}

void main()
{
    pragma(msg, Foo!(
        "One", 1, "First item",
        "Two", 2, "Second item").values
    );
}

Is it a bug?

=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jari-Matti_M=E4kel=E4?= <jmjmak utu.fi.invalid> writes:

Max Samukha wrote:
 The output when compiling the code below is "1, 1" while it should be
 "1, 2".  When 'names' declarations are commented out, the output is
 correct.

<snip>

 Is it a bug?

Yeah, something fishy is happening here (tested with dmd 1.013). This code

  template Foo(A...)
  {
    const char[] values = A[1].stringof;

    pragma(msg, A.length.stringof); // 1)
    pragma(msg, values);
  }

  void main()
  {
    alias Foo!(1,1,1,1,1) val;
  }

returns
  5
  5

but commenting the line 1) makes it return '1'. Also the compiler should
be able to infer the type of 'values' when 'char[]' is omitted, but it
doesn't. So, at least two bugs here.

Max Samukha <samukha voliacable.com> writes:

On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 23:42:37 +0300, Jari-Matti Makela
<jmjmak utu.fi.invalid> wrote:

Max Samukha wrote:
 The output when compiling the code below is "1, 1" while it should be
 "1, 2".  When 'names' declarations are commented out, the output is
 correct.

<snip>

 Is it a bug?

Yeah, something fishy is happening here (tested with dmd 1.013). This code

  template Foo(A...)
  {
    const char[] values = A[1].stringof;

    pragma(msg, A.length.stringof); // 1)
    pragma(msg, values);
  }

  void main()
  {
    alias Foo!(1,1,1,1,1) val;
  }

returns
  5
  5

but commenting the line 1) makes it return '1'. Also the compiler should
be able to infer the type of 'values' when 'char[]' is omitted, but it
doesn't. So, at least two bugs here.

Thanks. I've posted this to bugzilla