digitalmars.D.learn - Learn template by math vector class
- Darren (dgrant at kerberos-productions dot com) (56/56) Jun 21 2006 I am learning about D template details by implementing a static sized ve...
- Hasan Aljudy (8/76) Jun 22 2006 I think you can use static if:
- Brad Roberts (5/13) Jun 22 2006 Or the even simpler:
- Darren (24/31) Jun 22 2006 Wow. Thanks, that just worked, though I did it a bit different...
I am learning about D template details by implementing a static sized vector
class. Opinions on this code (like how to solve the obvious errors) or
alternatives that would be better practice in D would be appreciated:
class vector( T, size_t size )
{
private:
T p[ size ];
public:
this()
{
}
this( T[] q )
in
{
assert( q.length > 0 );
}
body
{
foreach ( size_t i, T v; q )
{
p[ i ] = v;
}
}
T opIndex( size_t i )
in
{
assert( i >= 0 && i < size );
}
body
{
return p[ i ];
}
T opIndexassign( T v, size_t i )
in
{
assert( i >= 0 && i < size );
}
body
{
p[ i ] = v;
return p[ i ];
}
T x() { return p[ 0 ]; }
T y() { return p[ 1 ]; }
T z() { return p[ 2 ]; }
T w() { return p[ 3 ]; }
void x( T v ) { p[ 0 ] = v; }
void y( T v ) { p[ 1 ] = v; }
void z( T v ) { p[ 2 ] = v; }
void w( T v ) { p[ 3 ] = v; }
}
example:
vector!( float, 2 ) 2d_vector;
So the obvious problem is that upon instantiation in the example, z and w
attributes implicitly generate array bounds errors. Is there a form of generic
specification in D that can be applied to solve this?
Jun 21 2006
Darren (dgrant at kerberos-productions dot com) wrote:
I am learning about D template details by implementing a static sized vector
class. Opinions on this code (like how to solve the obvious errors) or
alternatives that would be better practice in D would be appreciated:
class vector( T, size_t size )
{
private:
T p[ size ];
public:
this()
{
}
this( T[] q )
in
{
assert( q.length > 0 );
}
body
{
foreach ( size_t i, T v; q )
{
p[ i ] = v;
}
}
T opIndex( size_t i )
in
{
assert( i >= 0 && i < size );
}
body
{
return p[ i ];
}
T opIndexassign( T v, size_t i )
in
{
assert( i >= 0 && i < size );
}
body
{
p[ i ] = v;
return p[ i ];
}
T x() { return p[ 0 ]; }
T y() { return p[ 1 ]; }
T z() { return p[ 2 ]; }
T w() { return p[ 3 ]; }
void x( T v ) { p[ 0 ] = v; }
void y( T v ) { p[ 1 ] = v; }
void z( T v ) { p[ 2 ] = v; }
void w( T v ) { p[ 3 ] = v; }
}
example:
vector!( float, 2 ) 2d_vector;
So the obvious problem is that upon instantiation in the example, z and w
attributes implicitly generate array bounds errors. Is there a form of generic
specification in D that can be applied to solve this?
I think you can use static if:
static if( size < 3 ) //no z component
{
pragma( msg, "2d vectors don't have a z component" ); //tell
compiler to print this msg
static assert(false); //halt compiler
}
Jun 22 2006
On Thu, 22 Jun 2006, Hasan Aljudy wrote:
I think you can use static if:
static if( size < 3 ) //no z component
{
pragma( msg, "2d vectors don't have a z component" ); //tell compiler to
print this msg
static assert(false); //halt compiler
}
Or the even simpler:
static assert(size < 3, "2d vectors...");
Later,
Brad
Jun 22 2006
In article <e7dgpn$5q$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Hasan Aljudy says...
I think you can use static if:
static if( size < 3 ) //no z component
{
pragma( msg, "2d vectors don't have a z component" ); //tell
compiler to print this msg
static assert(false); //halt compiler
}
Wow. Thanks, that just worked, though I did it a bit different...
Like this:
class vector...
{
..
static if ( size >= 1 )
{
T x() { return p[ 0 ]; }
void x( T v ) { p[ 0 ] = v; }
}
..
}
Now is there a way to generalize this pattern with something like mixins?
ie. do something like
template elementAccessor( name, int index )
{
T name() { return p[ index ]; }
void name( T v ) { p[ index ] = v; }
}
mixin elementAccessor!( x, index = 0 );
mixin elementAccessor!( y, index = 1 );
mixin elementAccessor!( z, index = 2 );
mixin elementAccessor!( w, index = 3 );
Jun 22 2006









Brad Roberts <braddr puremagic.com> 