• =?UTF-8?B?Ikx1w61z?= Marques" (4/4) Sep 03 2013 If you do:
• Kai Nacke (4/8) Sep 03 2013 Yes. ldmd2 is a direct replacement for dmd and should behave the
• =?UTF-8?B?Ikx1w61z?= Marques" (2/4) Sep 04 2013 I submitted a bug report on GibHub: Issue #467.

=?UTF-8?B?Ikx1w61z?= Marques" <luis luismarques.eu> writes:

If you do:

     dmd -c file1.d file2.d etc.d

...you will get multiple .o files (one per .d file). Doing the 
same with ldmd2 only outputs file1.o. Is that a bug?

"Kai Nacke" <kai redstar.de> writes:

On Tuesday, 3 September 2013 at 23:14:14 UTC, Luís Marques wrote:
 If you do:

     dmd -c file1.d file2.d etc.d

 ...you will get multiple .o files (one per .d file). Doing the 
 same with ldmd2 only outputs file1.o. Is that a bug?

Yes. ldmd2 is a direct replacement for dmd and should behave the 
same way.

Kai

=?UTF-8?B?Ikx1w61z?= Marques" <luis luismarques.eu> writes:

On Wednesday, 4 September 2013 at 04:36:07 UTC, Kai Nacke wrote:
 Yes. ldmd2 is a direct replacement for dmd and should behave 
 the same way.