• Kai Nacke (6/6) Sep 03 2014 Hi all!
• Russel Winder via digitalmars-d-ldc (15/20) Sep 04 2014 DMD 2.066 release seems to have had some serious problems, Jordi's d-apt
• Dicebot (4/17) Sep 04 2014 I think by the time LDC side of things is settled, 2.066.1 should
• Russel Winder via digitalmars-d-ldc (13/15) Sep 04 2014 OK, I'll switch to the branch and build that for my working ldc2.
• Kai Nacke (8/21) Sep 04 2014 Hi Russel,
• David Nadlinger via digitalmars-d-ldc (6/9) Sep 04 2014 This is true. However, as most of the regressions are already fixed on

"Kai Nacke" <kai redstar.de> writes:

Hi all!

Alexey did some hard work and merged the latest dmd release 
2.066.0 into merge-2.066 branch. Try out if you like to live on 
the bleeding edge!

Regards,
Kai

Russel Winder via digitalmars-d-ldc <digitalmars-d-ldc puremagic.com> writes:

On Thu, 2014-09-04 at 05:16 +0000, Kai Nacke via digitalmars-d-ldc
wrote:
 Hi all!
=20
 Alexey did some hard work and merged the latest dmd release=20
 2.066.0 into merge-2.066 branch. Try out if you like to live on=20
 the bleeding edge!

DMD 2.066 release seems to have had some serious problems, Jordi's d-apt
is waiting for 2.067 staying on 2.065. Will LDC suffer equivalent issues
or were they nothing to do with the language spec per se?

--=20
Russel.
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D
Dr Russel Winder      t: +44 20 7585 2200   voip: sip:russel.winder ekiga.n=
et
41 Buckmaster Road    m: +44 7770 465 077   xmpp: russel winder.org.uk
London SW11 1EN, UK   w: www.russel.org.uk  skype: russel_winder

"Dicebot" <public dicebot.lv> writes:

On Thursday, 4 September 2014 at 07:28:08 UTC, Russel Winder via 
digitalmars-d-ldc wrote:
 On Thu, 2014-09-04 at 05:16 +0000, Kai Nacke via 
 digitalmars-d-ldc
 wrote:
 Hi all!
 
 Alexey did some hard work and merged the latest dmd release 
 2.066.0 into merge-2.066 branch. Try out if you like to live 
 on the bleeding edge!

 DMD 2.066 release seems to have had some serious problems, 
 Jordi's d-apt
 is waiting for 2.067 staying on 2.065. Will LDC suffer 
 equivalent issues
 or were they nothing to do with the language spec per se?

I think by the time LDC side of things is settled, 2.066.1 should 
be out already

Russel Winder via digitalmars-d-ldc <digitalmars-d-ldc puremagic.com> writes:

On Thu, 2014-09-04 at 12:20 +0000, Dicebot via digitalmars-d-ldc wrote:
[=E2=80=A6]
 I think by the time LDC side of things is settled, 2.066.1 should=20
 be out already

OK, I'll switch to the branch and build that for my working ldc2.

--=20
Russel.
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D
Dr Russel Winder      t: +44 20 7585 2200   voip: sip:russel.winder ekiga.n=
et
41 Buckmaster Road    m: +44 7770 465 077   xmpp: russel winder.org.uk
London SW11 1EN, UK   w: www.russel.org.uk  skype: russel_winder

"Kai Nacke" <kai redstar.de> writes:

On Thursday, 4 September 2014 at 07:28:08 UTC, Russel Winder via 
digitalmars-d-ldc wrote:
 On Thu, 2014-09-04 at 05:16 +0000, Kai Nacke via 
 digitalmars-d-ldc
 wrote:
 Hi all!
 
 Alexey did some hard work and merged the latest dmd release 
 2.066.0 into merge-2.066 branch. Try out if you like to live 
 on the bleeding edge!

 DMD 2.066 release seems to have had some serious problems, 
 Jordi's d-apt
 is waiting for 2.067 staying on 2.065. Will LDC suffer 
 equivalent issues
 or were they nothing to do with the language spec per se?

Hi Russel,

I did not follow the discussion about the regressions but my 
understanding is that most of them are problems in the semantic 
phase. Then LDC is affected.

Regards,
Kai

David Nadlinger via digitalmars-d-ldc <digitalmars-d-ldc puremagic.com> writes:

On 4 Sep 2014, at 18:08, Kai Nacke via digitalmars-d-ldc wrote:
 I did not follow the discussion about the regressions but my 
 understanding is that most of them are problems in the semantic phase. 
 Then LDC is affected.

This is true. However, as most of the regressions are already fixed on 
the 2.066 branch, we can simply merge the head of the branch instead (or 
wait for 2.066.1) before folding the changes into LDC master.

Best,
David