digitalmars.D.ldc - LDC Klee integration?
- Mike B Johnson (2/2) May 23 2017 Anyone know about this? Seems useful... if D could have something
- Mike B Johnson (2/5) May 23 2017 Also, can LDC use LLDB?
- Nicholas Wilson (3/8) May 23 2017 See https://github.com/ldc-developers/ldc/issues/2028 for
- David Nadlinger via digitalmars-d-ldc (7/10) May 24 2017 That issue is about LLD, which is one B short of a debugger. ;)
- Stefan Koch (3/6) May 23 2017 KLEE does not work with a current llvm.
Anyone know about this? Seems useful... if D could have something like this that is mostly automatic it would be very powerful.
May 23 2017
On Tuesday, 23 May 2017 at 21:00:26 UTC, Mike B Johnson wrote:Anyone know about this? Seems useful... if D could have something like this that is mostly automatic it would be very powerful.Also, can LDC use LLDB?
May 23 2017
On Tuesday, 23 May 2017 at 21:04:48 UTC, Mike B Johnson wrote:On Tuesday, 23 May 2017 at 21:00:26 UTC, Mike B Johnson wrote:See https://github.com/ldc-developers/ldc/issues/2028 for progress.Anyone know about this? Seems useful... if D could have something like this that is mostly automatic it would be very powerful.Also, can LDC use LLDB?
May 23 2017
On 24 May 2017, at 2:41, Nicholas Wilson via digitalmars-d-ldc wrote:On Tuesday, 23 May 2017 at 21:04:48 UTC, Mike B Johnson wrote:That issue is about LLD, which is one B short of a debugger. ;) LLDB can be used with any supported executable type, just like GDB, regardless of the compiler used to create it (thus, of course, including LDC). The handling of D types/mangled names might be a bit worse than in GDB, though. — DavidAlso, can LDC use LLDB?See https://github.com/ldc-developers/ldc/issues/2028 for progress.
May 24 2017
On Tuesday, 23 May 2017 at 21:00:26 UTC, Mike B Johnson wrote:Anyone know about this? Seems useful... if D could have something like this that is mostly automatic it would be very powerful.KLEE does not work with a current llvm. Also it's rather slow.
May 23 2017