• tastyminerals (5/5) Aug 13 2021 I tried to compile one of the D projects using our CI (Jenkins)
• kinke (7/12) Aug 13 2021 You'd probably have to go back quite a number steps - in recent
• tastyminerals (4/16) Aug 15 2021 I see, thank you.

tastyminerals <tastyminerals gmail.com> writes:

I tried to compile one of the D projects using our CI (Jenkins) 
today. Unfortunately, we use Debian Jessie as a base image and 
its glibc version is 2.19 while current 
`ldc2-1.27.0-linux-x86_64` requires 2.27. Which ldc2 version uses 
glibc 2.19 or compatible with Debian Jessie?

kinke <noone nowhere.com> writes:

On Friday, 13 August 2021 at 19:42:09 UTC, tastyminerals wrote:
 I tried to compile one of the D projects using our CI (Jenkins) 
 today. Unfortunately, we use Debian Jessie as a base image and 
 its glibc version is 2.19 while current 
 `ldc2-1.27.0-linux-x86_64` requires 2.27. Which ldc2 version 
 uses glibc 2.19 or compatible with Debian Jessie?

You'd probably have to go back quite a number steps - in recent 
years, we've always used the oldest non-EOL Ubuntu version as 
base image. Ubuntu 16 used for the last ~2 years (before the 
recent bump to 18) came with v2.23, so something < v1.15 might 
work (for which the packages weren't built automatically by CI 
services but manually).

tastyminerals <tastyminerals gmail.com> writes:

On Friday, 13 August 2021 at 21:33:17 UTC, kinke wrote:
 On Friday, 13 August 2021 at 19:42:09 UTC, tastyminerals wrote:
 I tried to compile one of the D projects using our CI 
 (Jenkins) today. Unfortunately, we use Debian Jessie as a base 
 image and its glibc version is 2.19 while current 
 `ldc2-1.27.0-linux-x86_64` requires 2.27. Which ldc2 version 
 uses glibc 2.19 or compatible with Debian Jessie?

 You'd probably have to go back quite a number steps - in recent 
 years, we've always used the oldest non-EOL Ubuntu version as 
 base image. Ubuntu 16 used for the last ~2 years (before the 
 recent bump to 18) came with v2.23, so something < v1.15 might 
 work (for which the packages weren't built automatically by CI 
 services but manually).

I see, thank you.
After some trial-and-error, I found that actually v1.21 worked 
with our image.