digitalmars.D.ldc - Compilation bug in LDC 0.12.0 with fasta Benchmark
- Thomas Mader (9/9) Jul 06 2014 The benchmark [1] compiles and runs without problems with gdc and
- bearophile (5/10) Jul 06 2014 Compiled on Windows 32 with the latest ldc2 that program seems to
- Christian Kamm (4/10) Jul 06 2014 Works for me with LDC master using -O -release.
- David Nadlinger (5/8) Jul 06 2014 Could you please try again with LDC 0.13.0? I also can't
- Thomas Mader (3/5) Jul 06 2014 LDC 0.13.0 fixed the problem, tanks very much!
The benchmark [1] compiles and runs without problems with gdc and dmd. With LDC 0.12.0 the compilation executes without problems but the executable run with './fasta_2 500' results in no console output. If someone can confirm this bug for the newest LDC version then I will create a bugzilla entry. [1] https://github.com/ThomasMader/benchmark/blob/master/src/fasta_2.d Thomas
Jul 06 2014
Thomas Mader:If someone can confirm this bug for the newest LDC version then I will create a bugzilla entry. [1] https://github.com/ThomasMader/benchmark/blob/master/src/fasta_2.d ThomasCompiled on Windows 32 with the latest ldc2 that program seems to work correctly. Bye, bearophile
Jul 06 2014
On 06.07.2014 15:42, Thomas Mader wrote:The benchmark [1] compiles and runs without problems with gdc and dmd. With LDC 0.12.0 the compilation executes without problems but the executable run with './fasta_2 500' results in no console output. If someone can confirm this bug for the newest LDC version then I will create a bugzilla entry. [1] https://github.com/ThomasMader/benchmark/blob/master/src/fasta_2.dWorks for me with LDC master using -O -release. Cheers, Christian
Jul 06 2014
Hi Thomas, On Sunday, 6 July 2014 at 13:42:28 UTC, Thomas Mader wrote:With LDC 0.12.0 the compilation executes without problems but the executable run with './fasta_2 500' results in no console output.Could you please try again with LDC 0.13.0? I also can't reproduce the failure with latest Git master. David
Jul 06 2014
On Sunday, 6 July 2014 at 14:35:33 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote:Could you please try again with LDC 0.13.0? I also can't reproduce the failure with latest Git master.LDC 0.13.0 fixed the problem, tanks very much! Thomas
Jul 06 2014