digitalmars.D.dwt - jface executable size down from 14 MB to 3 MB
- yidabu (10/10) May 22 2008 by set dsss oneatatime=yes, and build static dwt.lib, dwtx.lib, jface ex...
- Frank Benoit (2/8) May 22 2008 wow, that is good news
- arnaud (2/14) May 22 2008 But the exe works with DMD 1.030 and DWT/JFACE?
- Frank Benoit (3/17) May 22 2008 DMD 1.029 and 1.030 do not work because they crash in anonymous classes.
- arnaud (2/20) May 22 2008 But oneatatime is with DMD 1.030?
- Frank Benoit (2/22) May 22 2008 No, it was about the DSSS option in the DSSS compiler profile.
- Long Chang (15/15) May 23 2008 Content-Disposition: inline
- Frank Benoit (18/20) May 23 2008 3 MB is without the use of UPX... however
- Long Chang (6/6) May 24 2008 Content-Disposition: inline
- John Reimer (5/11) May 24 2008 Hmmm, that is a significant difference. And it doesn't look like those ...
- John Reimer (6/12) May 24 2008 I looked into this. These are packed with ASPack 2.11 which causes most...
- John Reimer (4/15) May 22 2008 Very strange. But I won't complain. :)
- Frank Benoit (2/10) May 22 2008 I tested it with the 0.75 release.
- John Reimer (8/19) May 24 2008 In what section do you put "oneatatime=yes"... I'm confused because in t...
- yidabu (12/21) May 24 2008 yes, once put "oneatatime=yes", library takes a long time to compile, ev...
by set dsss oneatatime=yes, and build static dwt.lib, dwtx.lib, jface executable size down from 14 MB to 3 MB, and executable compile time down from 60 seconds to 9 seconds. It's a great news for dwt fans! -- yidabu <yidabu.spam gmail.com> http://www.dsource.org/projects/dwin D ÓïÑÔ-ÖÐÎÄ(D Chinese): http://www.d-programming-language-china.org/ http://bbs.d-programming-language-china.org/ http://dwin.d-programming-language-china.org/ http://scite4d.d-programming-language-china.org/
May 22 2008
yidabu schrieb:by set dsss oneatatime=yes, and build static dwt.lib, dwtx.lib, jface executable size down from 14 MB to 3 MB, and executable compile time down from 60 seconds to 9 seconds. It's a great news for dwt fans!wow, that is good news
May 22 2008
Frank Benoit a écrit :yidabu schrieb:But the exe works with DMD 1.030 and DWT/JFACE?by set dsss oneatatime=yes, and build static dwt.lib, dwtx.lib, jface executable size down from 14 MB to 3 MB, and executable compile time down from 60 seconds to 9 seconds. It's a great news for dwt fans!wow, that is good news
May 22 2008
arnaud schrieb:Frank Benoit a écrit :DMD 1.029 and 1.030 do not work because they crash in anonymous classes. DMD 1.028 works.yidabu schrieb:But the exe works with DMD 1.030 and DWT/JFACE?by set dsss oneatatime=yes, and build static dwt.lib, dwtx.lib, jface executable size down from 14 MB to 3 MB, and executable compile time down from 60 seconds to 9 seconds. It's a great news for dwt fans!wow, that is good news
May 22 2008
Frank Benoit a écrit :arnaud schrieb:But oneatatime is with DMD 1.030?Frank Benoit a écrit :DMD 1.029 and 1.030 do not work because they crash in anonymous classes. DMD 1.028 works.yidabu schrieb:But the exe works with DMD 1.030 and DWT/JFACE?by set dsss oneatatime=yes, and build static dwt.lib, dwtx.lib, jface executable size down from 14 MB to 3 MB, and executable compile time down from 60 seconds to 9 seconds. It's a great news for dwt fans!wow, that is good news
May 22 2008
arnaud schrieb:Frank Benoit a écrit :No, it was about the DSSS option in the DSSS compiler profile.arnaud schrieb:But oneatatime is with DMD 1.030?Frank Benoit a écrit :DMD 1.029 and 1.030 do not work because they crash in anonymous classes. DMD 1.028 works.yidabu schrieb:But the exe works with DMD 1.030 and DWT/JFACE?by set dsss oneatatime=yes, and build static dwt.lib, dwtx.lib, jface executable size down from 14 MB to 3 MB, and executable compile time down from 60 seconds to 9 seconds. It's a great news for dwt fans!wow, that is good news
May 22 2008
Content-Disposition: inline MjAwOC81LzIyIEZyYW5rIEJlbm9pdCA8a2VpbmZhcmJ0b25AZ29vZ2xlbWFpbC5jb20+OgoKPiBh cm5hdWQgc2NocmllYjoKPgo+PiBGcmFuayBCZW5vaXQgYSDDqWNyaXQgOgo+Pgo+Pj4gYXJuYXVk IHNjaHJpZWI6Cj4+Pgo+Pj4+IEZyYW5rIEJlbm9pdCBhIMOpY3JpdCA6Cj4+Pj4KPj4+Pj4geWlk YWJ1IHNjaHJpZWI6Cj4+Pj4+Cj4+Pj4+PiBieSBzZXQgZHNzcyBvbmVhdGF0aW1lPXllcywgYW5k IGJ1aWxkIHN0YXRpYyBkd3QubGliLCBkd3R4LmxpYiwgamZhY2UKPj4+Pj4+IGV4ZWN1dGFibGUg c2l6ZSBkb3duIGZyb20gMTQgTUIgdG8gMyBNQiwgYW5kIGV4ZWN1dGFibGUgY29tcGlsZSB0aW1l IGRvd24KPj4+Pj4+IGZyb20gNjAgc2Vjb25kcyB0byA5IHNlY29uZHMuCj4+Pj4+Pgo+Pj4+Pj4g SXQncyBhIGdyZWF0IG5ld3MgZm9yIGR3dCBmYW5zIQo+Pj4+Pj4KPj4+Pj4+Cj4+Pj4+Pgo+Pj4+ Pj4KPj4+Pj4gd293LCB0aGF0IGlzIGdvb2QgbmV3cwo+Pj4+Pgo+Pj4+PiAgQnV0IHRoZSBleGUg d29ya3Mgd2l0aCBETUQgMS4wMzAgYW5kIERXVC9KRkFDRT8KPj4+Pgo+Pj4KPj4+IERNRCAxLjAy OSBhbmQgMS4wMzAgZG8gbm90IHdvcmsgYmVjYXVzZSB0aGV5IGNyYXNoIGluIGFub255bW91cyBj bGFzc2VzLgo+Pj4gRE1EIDEuMDI4IHdvcmtzLgo+Pj4KPj4gQnV0IG9uZWF0YXRpbWUgaXMgd2l0 aCBETUQgMS4wMzA/Cj4+Cj4KPiBObywgaXQgd2FzIGFib3V0IHRoZSBEU1NTIG9wdGlvbiBpbiB0 aGUgRFNTUyBjb21waWxlciBwcm9maWxlLgoKCnN0aWxsIHRvbyBiaWcuCg==
May 23 2008
Long Chang schrieb:still too big.3 MB is without the use of UPX... however Who defines 'too big' ? What is the limit? What rules do you apply to find that number? If you have hundreds of source files (tango+dwt+dwtx) it cannot go into a 250k executable. So what is small enough for you? And why should you use JFace if you want a mini app? If you would use a java application that is based on JFace, you need the Java runtime + SWT libs + Jface libs + SWT DLLs/SOs. The compiled DWT binary has all the needed functionality in itself. SWT and JFace is not optimized for small D applications. As in SWT so are withing JFace many internal dependencies between the classes. So even the little HelloWorld will contain the biggest part of SWT or JFace. Perhaps DDL can be an option, if big parts of the code can be moved into external libs. But still i don't know if you would count that to the executable size. If you want to distribute your app as a small zip file, you would still need to put the libs into that zip.
May 23 2008
Content-Disposition: inline I think it's too big is because: http://svn.dsource.org/projects/dwt/downloads/win32/examples/ . all the examples of less than 300kb. and http://hg.dsource.org/projects/dwt-samples examples size is between 2.5 ~ 6m.
May 24 2008
John Reimer <terminal.node gmail.com> Hello Long,I think it's too big is because: http://svn.dsource.org/projects/dwt/downloads/win32/examples/ . all the examples of less than 300kb. and http://hg.dsource.org/projects/dwt-samples examples size is between 2.5 ~ 6m.Hmmm, that is a significant difference. And it doesn't look like those executables are compressed. Thanks for pointing this out. This bears some looking into to. -JJR
May 24 2008
Hello Long,I think it's too big is because: http://svn.dsource.org/projects/dwt/downloads/win32/examples/ . all the examples of less than 300kb. and http://hg.dsource.org/projects/dwt-samples examples size is between 2.5 ~ 6m.I looked into this. These are packed with ASPack 2.11 which causes most of them to be shrunk by about 75% or more. I'm testing ASPack on some of the Dwt 3.4M7 examples right now to see how small they get. -JJR
May 24 2008
Hello yidabu,by set dsss oneatatime=yes, and build static dwt.lib, dwtx.lib, jface executable size down from 14 MB to 3 MB, and executable compile time down from 60 seconds to 9 seconds. It's a great news for dwt fans! D è¯è¨€-ä¸æ–‡(D Chinese): http://www.d-programming-language-china.org/ http://bbs.d-programming-language-china.org/ http://dwin.d-programming-language-china.org/ http://scite4d.d-programming-language-china.org/Very strange. But I won't complain. :) So this happens with the most recent dsss in svn? -JJR
May 22 2008
John Reimer schrieb:Very strange. But I won't complain. :) So this happens with the most recent dsss in svn? -JJRI tested it with the 0.75 release.
May 22 2008
Hello yidabu,by set dsss oneatatime=yes, and build static dwt.lib, dwtx.lib, jface executable size down from 14 MB to 3 MB, and executable compile time down from 60 seconds to 9 seconds. It's a great news for dwt fans! D è¯è¨€-ä¸æ–‡(D Chinese): http://www.d-programming-language-china.org/ http://bbs.d-programming-language-china.org/ http://dwin.d-programming-language-china.org/ http://scite4d.d-programming-language-china.org/In what section do you put "oneatatime=yes"... I'm confused because in the past doing this made the compiletimes much longer. This is why oneatatime=off was originally suggested. I tested setting it to "yes" today and it made the compile time extraordinarily long again. Perhaps you are saying that the library takes a long time to compile, but the executable compile time is fast? -JJR
May 24 2008
On Sat, 24 May 2008 14:11:40 +0000 (UTC) John Reimer <terminal.node gmail.com> wrote:In what section do you put "oneatatime=yes"... I'm confused because in the past doing this made the compiletimes much longer. This is why oneatatime=off was originally suggested. I tested setting it to "yes" today and it made the compile time extraordinarily long again. Perhaps you are saying that the library takes a long time to compile, but the executable compile time is fast? -JJRyes, once put "oneatatime=yes", library takes a long time to compile, even takes several hours to compile the dwt-addons svn, but the executable compile time is fast. -- yidabu <yidabu.spam gmail.com> http://www.dsource.org/projects/dwin D ÓïÑÔ-ÖÐÎÄ(D Chinese): http://www.d-programming-language-china.org/ http://bbs.d-programming-language-china.org/ http://dwin.d-programming-language-china.org/ http://scite4d.d-programming-language-china.org/
May 24 2008