www.digitalmars.com         C & C++   DMDScript  

digitalmars.D.dwt - Website

reply Jesse Phillips <jessekphillips gmail.com> writes:
Just went to the website, and I must say, very nice. I like the new look, 
very professional.
May 24 2008
next sibling parent reply John Reimer <terminal.node gmail.com> writes:
Hello Jesse,

 Just went to the website, and I must say, very nice. I like the new
 look, very professional.
 
It's a start. :) A big thanks to larsivi for his tips and the inspiration from the Tango site. Hopefully we can get a theme created and working for the wiki as well. -JJR
May 24 2008
parent reply Frank Benoit <keinfarbton googlemail.com> writes:
John Reimer schrieb:
 It's a start. :) 
 A big thanks to larsivi for his tips and the inspiration from the Tango 
 site. Hopefully we can get a theme created and working for the wiki as 
 well.
 
 -JJR
 
 
Yes, and also a big thanks to you John for pushing this forward. It is worth a lot to have a nice project representation. Frank
May 24 2008
parent Tower Ty <towerty msn.com.au> writes:
Looks good John 

Better put in a link
http://www.dsource.org/projects/dwt/wiki

Now to go play and delve deeper, couple of bits I havn't seen before
May 25 2008
prev sibling parent reply Jacob Carlborg <doobnet gmail.com> writes:
Jesse Phillips wrote:
 Just went to the website, and I must say, very nice. I like the new look, 
 very professional.
Very nice and a good initiative. But I have to say I don't like to logo that much. Shouldn't we mention on the front page a little more specific on which platforms dwt are available. I thinking mostly x86 and gtk for linux.
May 26 2008
next sibling parent John Reimer <terminal.node gmail.com> writes:
Hello Jacob,

 Jesse Phillips wrote:
 
 Just went to the website, and I must say, very nice. I like the new
 look, very professional.
 
Very nice and a good initiative. But I have to say I don't like to logo that much. Shouldn't we mention on the front page a little more specific on which platforms dwt are available. I thinking mostly x86 and gtk for linux.
I agree. The logo still needs some work. :) Good point about noting the specific platforms. Currently everything is indeed x86. I'll add that to my todo list. Thanks for the suggestions. -JJR
May 26 2008
prev sibling parent John Reimer <terminal.node gmail.com> writes:
Hello Jacob,

 Jesse Phillips wrote:
 
 Just went to the website, and I must say, very nice. I like the new
 look, very professional.
 
Very nice and a good initiative. But I have to say I don't like to logo that much. Shouldn't we mention on the front page a little more specific on which platforms dwt are available. I thinking mostly x86 and gtk for linux.
Fixed x86/gtk details. Also noted that once gdc is proven to work with dwt, it should be possible to build dwt-linux on non-x86 Linux platforms. Improved logo still on the agenda. Suggestions and mockups welcome. :) -JJR
May 28 2008