digitalmars.D.dwt - DWT partially updated to dmd 0.177
- torhu (15/15) Dec 12 2006 Since http://www.dsource.org/projects/dwt doesn't seem to work at the
- bobef (5/25) Dec 13 2006 I am using DWT. People working on Poseidon too. DWT is great. I wish
- =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Anders_F_Bj=F6rklund?= (5/11) Dec 13 2006 wxD needs some help with DMD and Windows, since I don't use those much.
- bls (11/36) Dec 17 2006 Hi Bobef,
- bobef (1/1) Dec 18 2006 Sounds good. Keep up the good work.
- Txarli (6/21) Dec 13 2006 I have used DWT too. I love it. D + DWT are a good tools to make a GUI
- Txarli (18/33) Dec 13 2006 StyledText did'nt work for me in ControlExample in DWT
Since http://www.dsource.org/projects/dwt doesn't seem to work at the moment, I'm posting this here. http://torhus.googlepages.com/dwt-dmd0177.zip I just added -d to the batch files, and removed an illegal and seemingly pointless opAssign(). That makes dwt compile with 0.177. The examples won't compile, however. No idea why yet, just got a weird linker error. The main problem probably was that the implicit conversion from a[] to a* is used a lot in the code. Which -d takes care of. One annoyance is that if you compile an app that is linked with dwt with -inline, you have to add -d too, otherwise the compiler still complains about a[] -> a* in dwt. I've fixed this in a few of the dwt files, but the implicit conversion is just used too much. So for most projects, you need -d if you want inlining. For now, anyway. By the way, is anyone else than me still using dwt? Sort of wish I had chosen wxD instead.
Dec 12 2006
I am using DWT. People working on Poseidon too. DWT is great. I wish Shawn had not abandoned DWT || we had tool to do automatically SWT>DWT translation || at least wxD work with DMD, because currently it is toooooo buggy. torhu wrote:Since http://www.dsource.org/projects/dwt doesn't seem to work at the moment, I'm posting this here. http://torhus.googlepages.com/dwt-dmd0177.zip I just added -d to the batch files, and removed an illegal and seemingly pointless opAssign(). That makes dwt compile with 0.177. The examples won't compile, however. No idea why yet, just got a weird linker error. The main problem probably was that the implicit conversion from a[] to a* is used a lot in the code. Which -d takes care of. One annoyance is that if you compile an app that is linked with dwt with -inline, you have to add -d too, otherwise the compiler still complains about a[] -> a* in dwt. I've fixed this in a few of the dwt files, but the implicit conversion is just used too much. So for most projects, you need -d if you want inlining. For now, anyway. By the way, is anyone else than me still using dwt? Sort of wish I had chosen wxD instead.
Dec 13 2006
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Anders_F_Bj=F6rklund?= <afb algonet.se> bobef wrote:wxD needs some help with DMD and Windows, since I don't use those much. I know the previous build had Unicode problems, but otherwise it should be limping along for ASCII strings at least ? I only tried it briefly. --andersBy the way, is anyone else than me still using dwt? Sort of wish I had chosen wxD instead.I am using DWT. People working on Poseidon too. DWT is great. I wish Shawn had not abandoned DWT || we had tool to do automatically SWT>DWT translation || at least wxD work with DMD, because currently it is toooooo buggy.
Dec 13 2006
Hi Bobef, Frank Benoit aka keinfarbton is working on a tool TIOPORT to automatically translate Java into D. Java to XML, XML to D AST, AST to D. AFAIK he made a lot of progress in porting SWT/GTK using this tool. Biggest problem at the moment seems to be Java reflection BUT thanks to the new ABI Thomas Kuehne is quit optimistic to solve outstanding problems. I hope I am able to help with the JFace port. since I do not like naked SWT. Bjoern "bobef" <be lessequal_dontspam.com> schreef in bericht news:elodda$1cho$1 digitaldaemon.com...I am using DWT. People working on Poseidon too. DWT is great. I wish Shawn had not abandoned DWT || we had tool to do automatically SWT>DWT translation || at least wxD work with DMD, because currently it is toooooo buggy. torhu wrote:Since http://www.dsource.org/projects/dwt doesn't seem to work at the moment, I'm posting this here. http://torhus.googlepages.com/dwt-dmd0177.zip I just added -d to the batch files, and removed an illegal and seemingly pointless opAssign(). That makes dwt compile with 0.177. The examples won't compile, however. No idea why yet, just got a weird linker error. The main problem probably was that the implicit conversion from a[] to a* is used a lot in the code. Which -d takes care of. One annoyance is that if you compile an app that is linked with dwt with -inline, you have to add -d too, otherwise the compiler still complains about a[] -> a* in dwt. I've fixed this in a few of the dwt files, but the implicit conversion is just used too much. So for most projects, you need -d if you want inlining. For now, anyway. By the way, is anyone else than me still using dwt? Sort of wish I had chosen wxD instead.
Dec 17 2006
I have used DWT too. I love it. D + DWT are a good tools to make a GUI native application. JCarles Vilaseca Catalonia, Spain "torhu" <fake address.dude> escribió en el mensaje news:elo7lv$14pt$1 digitaldaemon.com...Since http://www.dsource.org/projects/dwt doesn't seem to work at the moment, I'm posting this here. http://torhus.googlepages.com/dwt-dmd0177.zip I just added -d to the batch files, and removed an illegal and seemingly pointless opAssign(). That makes dwt compile with 0.177. The examples won't compile, however. No idea why yet, just got a weird linker error. The main problem probably was that the implicit conversion from a[] to a* is used a lot in the code. Which -d takes care of. One annoyance is that if you compile an app that is linked with dwt with -inline, you have to add -d too, otherwise the compiler still complains about a[] -> a* in dwt. I've fixed this in a few of the dwt files, but the implicit conversion is just used too much. So for most projects, you need -d if you want inlining. For now, anyway. By the way, is anyone else than me still using dwt? Sort of wish I had chosen wxD instead.
Dec 13 2006
StyledText did'nt work for me in ControlExample in DWT
First, I get OpCmp not defined for class Integer.
I was trying to append:
public int opCmp(Object obj)
{
if (cast(Integer)obj)
return value - (cast(Integer)obj).intValue();
else
return 0;
}
to Integer class in util/javatypes.d
But now I get AccesViolation when focus StyledText TAB and before exit
ControlExample program.
Any sugestion?
Regards
JCarles
"torhu" <fake address.dude> escribió en el mensaje
news:elo7lv$14pt$1 digitaldaemon.com...
Since http://www.dsource.org/projects/dwt doesn't seem to work at the
moment, I'm posting this here.
http://torhus.googlepages.com/dwt-dmd0177.zip
I just added -d to the batch files, and removed an illegal and seemingly
pointless opAssign(). That makes dwt compile with 0.177. The examples
won't compile, however. No idea why yet, just got a weird linker error.
The main problem probably was that the implicit conversion from a[] to a*
is used a lot in the code. Which -d takes care of.
One annoyance is that if you compile an app that is linked with dwt
with -inline, you have to add -d too, otherwise the compiler still
complains about a[] -> a* in dwt. I've fixed this in a few of the dwt
files, but the implicit conversion is just used too much. So for most
projects, you need -d if you want inlining. For now, anyway.
By the way, is anyone else than me still using dwt? Sort of wish I had
chosen wxD instead.
Dec 13 2006