• Andrei Alexandrescu (3/3) May 29 2015 Folks, looks like there are multiple breakages in the Phobos
• Steven Schveighoffer (4/7) May 29 2015 I'm working on the UnixAddress issues, will have a PR after I verify it
• Steven Schveighoffer (9/15) May 29 2015 PR: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/3344
• Andrei Alexandrescu (2/18) May 29 2015 cc Brad Roberts -- Andrei
• Brad Roberts via Digitalmars-d (7/21) May 29 2015 I agree that some sort of testing infrastructure should be built for doc...
• H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d (10/27) May 29 2015 There's a problem with building it on just one platform:
• Vladimir Panteleev (5/7) May 30 2015 Not as good as testing PRs, but I added an hourly cronjob to the
• Steven Schveighoffer (3/8) May 30 2015 thanks!
• Steven Schveighoffer (4/12) Jun 01 2015 For my understanding, where is the staging area? Is it this?
• Vladimir Panteleev (3/5) Jun 01 2015 http://wiki.dlang.org/User:Vladimir_Panteleev/Website_staging
• Vladimir Panteleev (3/6) May 29 2015 https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime/pull/1289/files

Andrei Alexandrescu <SeeWebsiteForEmail erdani.org> writes:

Folks, looks like there are multiple breakages in the Phobos 
documentation build for dlang.org. Could someone look into this pronto? 
-- Andrei

Steven Schveighoffer <schveiguy yahoo.com> writes:

On 5/29/15 3:35 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
 Folks, looks like there are multiple breakages in the Phobos
 documentation build for dlang.org. Could someone look into this pronto?
 -- Andrei

I'm working on the UnixAddress issues, will have a PR after I verify it 
passes the normal tests.

-Steve

Steven Schveighoffer <schveiguy yahoo.com> writes:

On 5/29/15 3:47 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
 On 5/29/15 3:35 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
 Folks, looks like there are multiple breakages in the Phobos
 documentation build for dlang.org. Could someone look into this pronto?
 -- Andrei

 I'm working on the UnixAddress issues, will have a PR after I verify it
 passes the normal tests.

PR: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/3344

And BTW, how can we get the ddoc build to be part of the auto tester? 
It's kind of important. Luckily, it's only built on one platform, we can 
pick the fastest.

If at all possible, if the auto generated ddocs could be available for 
the PR, that would be hugely helpful. Right now, when ddoc changes are 
made, you have to build them locally to see the changes.

-Steve

Andrei Alexandrescu <SeeWebsiteForEmail erdani.org> writes:

On 5/29/15 3:56 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
 On 5/29/15 3:47 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
 On 5/29/15 3:35 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
 Folks, looks like there are multiple breakages in the Phobos
 documentation build for dlang.org. Could someone look into this pronto?
 -- Andrei

 I'm working on the UnixAddress issues, will have a PR after I verify it
 passes the normal tests.

 PR: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/3344

 And BTW, how can we get the ddoc build to be part of the auto tester?
 It's kind of important. Luckily, it's only built on one platform, we can
 pick the fastest.

 If at all possible, if the auto generated ddocs could be available for
 the PR, that would be hugely helpful. Right now, when ddoc changes are
 made, you have to build them locally to see the changes.

 -Steve

cc Brad Roberts -- Andrei

Brad Roberts via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d puremagic.com> writes:

On 5/29/15 4:02 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
 On 5/29/15 3:56 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
 PR: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/3344

 And BTW, how can we get the ddoc build to be part of the auto tester?
 It's kind of important. Luckily, it's only built on one platform, we can
 pick the fastest.

 If at all possible, if the auto generated ddocs could be available for
 the PR, that would be hugely helpful. Right now, when ddoc changes are
 made, you have to build them locally to see the changes.

 -Steve

 cc Brad Roberts -- Andrei

I agree that some sort of testing infrastructure should be built for
documentation build, review, 
and testing.  I don't believe that the needs overlap sufficiently with code
building and testing and 
can be made generic enough (the d doc tooling is _very_ specific to d) to fit
into a generic CI tool 
that it fits within the current auto-tester.  There's certainly some very high
level overlaps, but 
ultimately, I believe that something dedicated to documentation
build/review/testing would be a 
better path.

"H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d" <digitalmars-d puremagic.com> writes:

On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 03:56:43PM -0600, Steven Schveighoffer via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
 On 5/29/15 3:47 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 5/29/15 3:35 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Folks, looks like there are multiple breakages in the Phobos
documentation build for dlang.org. Could someone look into this pronto?
-- Andrei

I'm working on the UnixAddress issues, will have a PR after I verify
it passes the normal tests.

 
 PR: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/3344
 
 And BTW, how can we get the ddoc build to be part of the auto tester?
 It's kind of important. Luckily, it's only built on one platform, we
 can pick the fastest.

There's a problem with building it on just one platform:
platform-specific docs don't get built. For example, std.windows.* isn't
getting built at all. Even if we added it to the makefile, it still
wouldn't work, since it's version'd out by platform.


 If at all possible, if the auto generated ddocs could be available for
 the PR, that would be hugely helpful. Right now, when ddoc changes are
 made, you have to build them locally to see the changes.

[...]

+1. This would be an incredibly useful addition to the autotester.


T

-- 
Designer clothes: how to cover less by paying more.

"Vladimir Panteleev" <vladimir thecybershadow.net> writes:

On Friday, 29 May 2015 at 21:56:43 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer 
wrote:
 And BTW, how can we get the ddoc build to be part of the auto 
 tester?

Not as good as testing PRs, but I added an hourly cronjob to the 
staging site. At least now I'll know if something we merged broke 
building the website.

Steven Schveighoffer <schveiguy yahoo.com> writes:

On 5/30/15 4:06 AM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
 On Friday, 29 May 2015 at 21:56:43 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
 And BTW, how can we get the ddoc build to be part of the auto tester?

 Not as good as testing PRs, but I added an hourly cronjob to the staging
 site. At least now I'll know if something we merged broke building the
 website.

thanks!

-Steve

Steven Schveighoffer <schveiguy yahoo.com> writes:

On 5/30/15 5:29 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
 On 5/30/15 4:06 AM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
 On Friday, 29 May 2015 at 21:56:43 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
 And BTW, how can we get the ddoc build to be part of the auto tester?

 Not as good as testing PRs, but I added an hourly cronjob to the staging
 site. At least now I'll know if something we merged broke building the
 website.

 thanks!

For my understanding, where is the staging area? Is it this?

http://dlang.org/phobos-prerelease/index.html

-Steve

"Vladimir Panteleev" <vladimir thecybershadow.net> writes:

On Monday, 1 June 2015 at 14:18:55 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer 
wrote:
 For my understanding, where is the staging area? Is it this?

 http://dlang.org/phobos-prerelease/index.html

http://wiki.dlang.org/User:Vladimir_Panteleev/Website_staging

"Vladimir Panteleev" <vladimir thecybershadow.net> writes:

On Friday, 29 May 2015 at 21:35:23 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
 Folks, looks like there are multiple breakages in the Phobos 
 documentation build for dlang.org. Could someone look into this 
 pronto? -- Andrei

https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime/pull/1289/files
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/3346