• kris (2/2) Mar 16 2007 Last time I checked, DDoc did not emit private methods etc. Apparently
• Walter Bright (2/4) Mar 16 2007 It's not supposed to. If you have an example, please submit to bugzilla.
• BCS (3/6) Mar 17 2007 Can we please get a flag that will turn this on and off??? I have wanted...
• Chris Nicholson-Sauls (3/13) Mar 17 2007 Ditto.
• Ary Manzana (3/13) Mar 18 2007 Why not select the least protection level shown in ddoc: private,

kris <foo bar.com> writes:

Last time I checked, DDoc did not emit private methods etc. Apparently 
it now does? Can we turn that off again please?

Walter Bright <newshound digitalmars.com> writes:

kris wrote:
 Last time I checked, DDoc did not emit private methods etc. Apparently 
 it now does? Can we turn that off again please?

It's not supposed to. If you have an example, please submit to bugzilla.

BCS <ao pathlink.com> writes:

Reply to kris,

 Last time I checked, DDoc did not emit private methods etc. Apparently
 it now does? Can we turn that off again please?
 

Can we please get a flag that will turn this on and off??? I have wanted 
this for some time.

Chris Nicholson-Sauls <ibisbasenji gmail.com> writes:

BCS wrote:
 Reply to kris,
 
 Last time I checked, DDoc did not emit private methods etc. Apparently
 it now does? Can we turn that off again please?

 
 Can we please get a flag that will turn this on and off??? I have wanted 
 this for some time.
 
 

Ditto.

-- Chris Nicholson-Sauls

Ary Manzana <ary esperanto.org.ar> writes:

BCS escribió:
 Reply to kris,
 
 Last time I checked, DDoc did not emit private methods etc. Apparently
 it now does? Can we turn that off again please?

 
 Can we please get a flag that will turn this on and off??? I have wanted 
 this for some time.
 
 

Why not select the least protection level shown in ddoc: private, 
protected, public, kike in javadoc?