digitalmars.D - combine dlang/tools into a single (or a few) binaries
- Timothee Cour via Digitalmars-d (9/9) Sep 23 2016 instead of having multiple binaries polluting global namespace what abou...
- rikki cattermole (4/13) Sep 23 2016 I'd suggest dlangtools instead.
- ketmar (4/5) Sep 23 2016 exactly the thing virtually nobody will type even with
- rikki cattermole (2/5) Sep 23 2016 Bingo! No reason for us to invite name conflicts.
- ketmar (4/11) Sep 23 2016 i bet someone already has dlangtools executable. i suggest
instead of having multiple binaries polluting global namespace what about combining them into: dtools --catdoc dtools --changed etc with maybe exception of a few such as rdmd advantages: less pollution of global namespace, smaller overall size (binaries duplicate code), more opportunities for refactoring
Sep 23 2016
On 24/09/2016 9:47 AM, Timothee Cour via Digitalmars-d wrote:instead of having multiple binaries polluting global namespace what about combining them into: dtools --catdoc dtools --changed etc with maybe exception of a few such as rdmd advantages: less pollution of global namespace, smaller overall size (binaries duplicate code), more opportunities for refactoringI'd suggest dlangtools instead. After all, dtools sounds like something that could be used by other projects.
Sep 23 2016
On Saturday, 24 September 2016 at 04:54:51 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:I'd suggest dlangtools instead.exactly the thing virtually nobody will type even with autocompletion.
Sep 23 2016
On 24/09/2016 5:11 PM, ketmar wrote:On Saturday, 24 September 2016 at 04:54:51 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:Bingo! No reason for us to invite name conflicts.I'd suggest dlangtools instead.exactly the thing virtually nobody will type even with autocompletion.
Sep 23 2016
On Saturday, 24 September 2016 at 05:19:39 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:On 24/09/2016 5:11 PM, ketmar wrote:i bet someone already has dlangtools executable. i suggest NaIswgm0Z7A3YmK.On Saturday, 24 September 2016 at 04:54:51 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:Bingo! No reason for us to invite name conflicts.I'd suggest dlangtools instead.exactly the thing virtually nobody will type even with autocompletion.
Sep 23 2016