• BCS (6/6) Aug 30 2007 I was having trouble getting something to compile a while ago and it tur...
• Derek Parnell (6/12) Aug 30 2007 BTW, 'Bud' does this with the -V switch.
• BCS (2/14) Aug 30 2007 Just for BUD's args or does it figure out what DMD will be fed?
• Derek Parnell (6/22) Aug 30 2007 Everything. In fact, it might be a little too verbose for some people.
• BCS (3/23) Aug 30 2007 I work with 400K trace logs for fun, their is no sutch thing as "a littl...

BCS <ao pathlink.com> writes:

I was having trouble getting something to compile a while ago and it turned 
out that the problem was there was a sc.ini sitting in the dir I was working 
in. I was playing with settings so I expected something like this but the 
-v flag didn't give me anything useful. It would be nice to have the -v flag 
(or a -vv flag) given the full effective command line as gathered from all 
over the place and where the args come from.

Derek Parnell <derek psych.ward> writes:

On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 21:33:47 +0000 (UTC), BCS wrote:

 I was having trouble getting something to compile a while ago and it turned 
 out that the problem was there was a sc.ini sitting in the dir I was working 
 in. I was playing with settings so I expected something like this but the 
 -v flag didn't give me anything useful. It would be nice to have the -v flag 
 (or a -vv flag) given the full effective command line as gathered from all 
 over the place and where the args come from.

BTW, 'Bud' does this with the -V switch.

-- 
Derek Parnell
Melbourne, Australia
skype: derek.j.parnell

BCS <ao pathlink.com> writes:

Reply to Derek,

 On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 21:33:47 +0000 (UTC), BCS wrote:
 
 I was having trouble getting something to compile a while ago and it
 turned out that the problem was there was a sc.ini sitting in the dir
 I was working in. I was playing with settings so I expected something
 like this but the -v flag didn't give me anything useful. It would be
 nice to have the -v flag (or a -vv flag) given the full effective
 command line as gathered from all over the place and where the args
 come from.
 

 BTW, 'Bud' does this with the -V switch.
 

Just for BUD's args or does it figure out what DMD will be fed?

Derek Parnell <derek psych.ward> writes:

On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 22:14:18 +0000 (UTC), BCS wrote:

 Reply to Derek,
 
 On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 21:33:47 +0000 (UTC), BCS wrote:
 
 I was having trouble getting something to compile a while ago and it
 turned out that the problem was there was a sc.ini sitting in the dir
 I was working in. I was playing with settings so I expected something
 like this but the -v flag didn't give me anything useful. It would be
 nice to have the -v flag (or a -vv flag) given the full effective
 command line as gathered from all over the place and where the args
 come from.
 

 BTW, 'Bud' does this with the -V switch.
 

 
 Just for BUD's args or does it figure out what DMD will be fed?

Everything. In fact, it might be a little too verbose for some people.

-- 
Derek Parnell
Melbourne, Australia
skype: derek.j.parnell

BCS <ao pathlink.com> writes:

Reply to Derek,

 On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 22:14:18 +0000 (UTC), BCS wrote:
 
 Reply to Derek,
 
 On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 21:33:47 +0000 (UTC), BCS wrote:
 
 I was having trouble getting something to compile a while ago and
 it turned out that the problem was there was a sc.ini sitting in
 the dir I was working in. I was playing with settings so I expected
 something like this but the -v flag didn't give me anything useful.
 It would be nice to have the -v flag (or a -vv flag) given the full
 effective command line as gathered from all over the place and
 where the args come from.
 

 BTW, 'Bud' does this with the -V switch.
 

 Just for BUD's args or does it figure out what DMD will be fed?
 

 Everything. In fact, it might be a little too verbose for some people.
 

I work with 400K trace logs for fun, their is no sutch thing as "a little 
too verbose". <G>