• nobody (32/32) Feb 14 2007 When I compile (v1.0) the following code for some reason opIndexDg's sta...
• Frits van Bommel (7/13) Feb 14 2007 [snip]
• nobody (2/16) Feb 14 2007 Thanks that certainly was just a typo on my part!

nobody <nobody mailinator.com> writes:

When I compile (v1.0) the following code for some reason opIndexDg's stack 
pointer is null and opIndexAssignDg's stack pointer is not.

----------------
   struct S
   {
     real delegate(size_t i, size_t j) opIndexDg;
     real delegate(real r, size_t i, size_t j) opIndexAssignDg;

     void dbg()
     {
       printf("&opIndexDg : [%X]\n", &opIndexDg );
       printf("     func -> [%X]\n", opIndexDg.funcptr );
       printf("    stack -> [%X]\n", opIndexDg.ptr );

       printf("&opIndexAssignDg : [%X]\n", &opIndexAssignDg );
       printf("           func -> [%X]\n", opIndexAssignDg.funcptr );
       printf("          stack -> [%X]\n", &opIndexAssignDg.ptr );
     }

   };


   int main(char[][] args)
   {
     S s;
     s.dbg();
     return 0;
   }
----------------

Output:

----------------

&opIndexDg : [12FF28]
      func -> [0]
     stack -> [0]
&opIndexAssignDg : [12FF30]
            func -> [0]
           stack -> [12FF30]

Frits van Bommel <fvbommel REMwOVExCAPSs.nl> writes:

nobody wrote:
 When I compile (v1.0) the following code for some reason opIndexDg's 
 stack pointer is null and opIndexAssignDg's stack pointer is not.
 
 ----------------

[snip]
       printf("    stack -> [%X]\n", opIndexDg.ptr );

[snip]
       printf("          stack -> [%X]\n", &opIndexAssignDg.ptr );

                                             ^ You have an extra '&' here

If you remove that it should also be null (it was for me).
The address you were printing was where the null pointer was stored, not 
the null pointer itself :P.

nobody <nobody mailinator.com> writes:

Frits van Bommel wrote:
 nobody wrote:
 When I compile (v1.0) the following code for some reason opIndexDg's 
 stack pointer is null and opIndexAssignDg's stack pointer is not.

 ----------------

 [snip]
       printf("    stack -> [%X]\n", opIndexDg.ptr );

 [snip]
       printf("          stack -> [%X]\n", &opIndexAssignDg.ptr );

                                             ^ You have an extra '&' here
 
 If you remove that it should also be null (it was for me).
 The address you were printing was where the null pointer was stored, not 
 the null pointer itself :P.

Thanks that certainly was just a typo on my part!