digitalmars.D.bugs - [Issue 9608] New: Add introspection for templates
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (31/31) Feb 27 2013 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9608
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (12/12) Feb 27 2013 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9608
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (32/34) Mar 23 2013 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9608
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (7/7) Mar 24 2013 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9608
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9608 Summary: Add introspection for templates Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: DMD AssignedTo: nobody puremagic.com ReportedBy: andrei erdani.com PST --- Currently given a template symbol it's not possible to do simple introspection on it, such as getting arity, distinguishing alias vs. type parameters, and figuring out variadics. Example: template A(alias sym) { ... } A!((a, b) => a.name < b.name); A is unable to tell the number of parameters of the lambda. It could if it knew what type to instantiate it, and in order to know that it needs the actual instantiation type. There should be enough introspection chops to compute the number of parameters without instantiating the lambda. There would be a fair amount of design involved because currently there's no kind that expresses a template's parameters outside the template. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Feb 27 2013
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9608 Andrej Mitrovic <andrej.mitrovich gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |andrej.mitrovich gmail.com 15:16:48 PST --- Is Issue 4265 relevant in any way (does it help?)? I think I almost have a pull ready for Issue 4265, but it depends on whether people really want the feature. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Feb 27 2013
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9608 11:32:36 PDT ---There would be a fair amount of design involved because currently there's no kind that expresses a template's parameters outside the template.I don't think we need to design much. We could provide traits. For example: template A(alias sym) { __traits(getArity, sym); // 2 - or paramCount __traits(isAliasParam, 0, sym); // 0 == index of param } A!((a, b) => a.name < b.name); template B(alias sym) { __traits(isValueParam, 0, sym); // true __traits(isTypeParam, 1, sym); // true __traits(isVariadicParam, 2, sym); // true } void X(int val, Type, Args...)(Args t) { return 0; } B!(X); And then you could wrap all of this into a Phobos template which collects all the data. let's call it TemplateInfo: template B(alias sym) { alias ti = TemplateInfo!sym; static assert(ti.params.count == 2); static assert(ti.params[0].isValueParam); } void X(Type, int val)() { } B!(X); That sort of stuff. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Mar 23 2013
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9608 PDT --- Yah, issue 4265 is related. For this one, the challenge is defining a minimal and complete set of traits. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Mar 24 2013