digitalmars.D.bugs - [Issue 7691] New: A pure std.math.floor
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (29/29) Mar 11 2012 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7691
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (10/10) Mar 28 2012 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7691
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (7/8) Mar 28 2012 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7691
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (7/7) Mar 28 2012 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7691
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (17/19) Mar 28 2012 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7691
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7691 Summary: A pure std.math.floor Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Keywords: rejects-valid Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: Phobos AssignedTo: nobody puremagic.com ReportedBy: bearophile_hugs eml.cc import std.math: floor; pure void main() { enum double x = floor(2.3); } DMD 2.059head gives: test.d(3): Error: pure function 'main' cannot call impure function 'floor' ...\dmd2\src\phobos\std\math.d(1917): Error: floorl cannot be interpreted at compile time, because it has no available source code test.d(3): called from here: floor(2.3L) So there are two problems here, floor is not pure and it can't run at compile-time. std.math.fmod() too isn't pure. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Mar 11 2012
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7691 hsteoh quickfur.ath.cx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hsteoh quickfur.ath.cx Most std.math functions need use asm; we need to write ctfe versions for them. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Mar 28 2012
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7691Most std.math functions need use asm; we need to write ctfe versions for them.But note that I'd like to use it mostly in run-time code. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Mar 28 2012
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7691 Does dmd even support pureness checking for asm blocks? If not, I'm not sure when we will be able to mark asm functions as pure. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Mar 28 2012
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7691 Don <clugdbug yahoo.com.au> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |clugdbug yahoo.com.auDoes dmd even support pureness checking for asm blocks? If not, I'm not sure when we will be able to mark asm functions as pure.asm blocks are ignored for pureness checking. And I think it has to be that way. In the asm for BigInt, at one point I write to a static variable. That variable is never read from, EVER. It's a trick to force Intel processors to stay in sync every pass through the loop. It would be impossible to enforce, anyway. BTW: floor() isn't pure, because floorl() isn't pure, because floorl(), being a C function, may set the matherr variable. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Mar 28 2012