• d-bugmail puremagic.com (36/36) Jan 29 2012 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7395

d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7395

           Summary: Need error on declaring a variable after `if`
                    and`synchronized` without {}
           Product: D
           Version: D1 & D2
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Keywords: diagnostic
          Severity: enhancement
          Priority: P2
         Component: DMD
        AssignedTo: nobody puremagic.com
        ReportedBy: verylonglogin.reg gmail.com



---
---
synchronized int i; // should be definitely an error

if(true) int i;     // IMHO, should be an error
if(true) l: f();    // should be probably an error
---

Consider the following D code copied from C:
---
volatile int* p; // volatile statements deprecated; use synchronized statements
instead
---
A one is forced to change `volatile` -> `synchronized` after brief look at the
error and, if he will be unhappy enough, his program will compile.

Therefore a case with `if` looks lass common but still signalize about an
error.

`l: int i;` case): `error CS1023: Embedded statement cannot be a declaration or
labeled statement`.

Also look at Issue 2197.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------