www.digitalmars.com         C & C++   DMDScript  

digitalmars.D.bugs - [Issue 7313] New: the result of a 'new' expression should implicitly cast to (im)mutable

reply d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7313

           Summary: the result of a 'new' expression should implicitly
                    cast to (im)mutable
           Product: D
           Version: D2
          Platform: Other
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: enhancement
          Priority: P2
         Component: DMD
        AssignedTo: nobody puremagic.com
        ReportedBy: timon.gehr gmx.ch



the following code should compile:
void main(){
    immutable a = new int[1];
    int[] b = new immutable(int)[1];
}

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jan 18 2012
next sibling parent d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7313


Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg gmx.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jmdavisProg gmx.com
           Platform|Other                       |All
         OS/Version|Linux                       |All



PST ---
I can see why that would be nice with regards to primitives, but I would point
out that that wouldn't work with structs or classes (or with arrays of structs
or classes).

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jan 18 2012
prev sibling parent d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7313




It works with any type that has a pure constructor where all (unscoped)
constructor arguments convert to the respective qualifier.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jan 18 2012