digitalmars.D.bugs - [Issue 717] New: toobj.c:191: virtual void ClassDeclaration::toObjFile(): Assertion `!scope' failed.
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (49/49) Dec 22 2006 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=717
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (33/33) Sep 18 2007 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=717
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (9/9) Oct 30 2007 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=717
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=717 Summary: toobj.c:191: virtual void ClassDeclaration::toObjFile(): Assertion `!scope' failed. Product: D Version: 0.177 Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: DMD AssignedTo: bugzilla digitalmars.com ReportedBy: thomas-dloop kuehne.cn (Originally posted by bobef <bobef lessequal.com> on 2006-03-01 as news:du4ojh$1b0n$1 digitaldaemon.com) and cause the compiler message: toobj.c:195: virtual void ClassDeclaration::toObjFile(): Assertion `!scope' failed test cases: http://dstress.kuehne.cn/nocompile/c/class_22_C.d http://dstress.kuehne.cn/nocompile/c/class_22_E.d --
Dec 22 2006
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=717 smjg iname.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |smjg iname.com Keywords| |diagnostic, ice-on-invalid- | |code Please remember to assign keywords to bug reports. To everybody reading this: Please look through issues you've reported and check for missing keywords. As I try it in DMD 1.020 (Windows), I don't get a crash, but these error messages: bz717a.d(2): class bz717a.main.T!().A has forward references bz717a.d(4): class bz717a.main.T!().B has forward references bz717b.d(2): class bz717b.main.T!().B has forward references If I put the classes into main directly.... ---------- void main(){ class B : A{ } class A{ } } ---------- bz717c.d(2): Error: identifier 'A' is not defined bz717c.d(2): Error: A is used as a type bz717c.d(2): class bz717c.main.B base type must be class or interface, not void ---------- I'm not sure if your second testcase and mine should be legal. It's in the spec (unless it's changed since I looked) that nested functions can't forward-reference each other, but I'm not sure if this applies to classes within functions as well. --
Sep 18 2007
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=717 bugzilla digitalmars.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WORKSFORME Gives decent error message, no seg fault, with dmd 1.022 and 2.006. --
Oct 30 2007