## digitalmars.D.bugs - [Issue 6478] New: Implement conservative range-checking for array lengths

d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
```http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6478

Summary: Implement conservative range-checking for array
lengths
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nobody puremagic.com
ReportedBy: clugdbug yahoo.com.au

--- Comment #0 from Don <clugdbug yahoo.com.au> 2011-08-12 02:36:16 PDT ---
For every dynamic array variable x in a function:
* Scan every statement in the function for length-changing assignment to x.
Distinguish three cases:
(a) assignment from something of known length
x = array literal of length N
x = static array of length N
x.length = N
x = new T[N]
---> For all of these, the possible length of X is equal to the range of N.

(b) relative length change by a known amount
x ~= expression_of_fixed_length;
x.length += N;
x = x ~ expression_of_fixed_length;
If any of these occur inside a loop or a nested function (or in a function with
a goto statement), the range of x is 0..size_t; except in the case where length
= length - N. Otherwise, new range of range of x.length = oldrange + N.range.

(c) anything else
conservatively assume that the length of x could be 0..size_t/(x[0].sizeof).

* Any use of asm or a pointer inside the function should set the range of all
arrays to 0..size_t/(x[0].sizeof).

The reason I think this is valuable, is that most arrays do not arbitrarily
change size throughout a function.

Benefits:
(1) Eliminate most false positives from signed-unsigned mismatches.
Cases like this:

int [] x = new int[6]; // or x = some array literal.
for (int i = 0; i < x.length; ++i) {...}

As long as x is only assigned from an object of known length, this sort of
thing is always safe.

(2) This minimal array-length range tracking would also allow some
out-of-bounds array indexing errors to be detected at compile time.

--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
```
Aug 12 2011
d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
```http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6478

Don <clugdbug yahoo.com.au> changed: