www.digitalmars.com         C & C++   DMDScript  

digitalmars.D.bugs - [Issue 4019] New: [CTFE] Adding an item to an AA

reply d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4019

           Summary: [CTFE] Adding an item to an AA
           Product: D
           Version: future
          Platform: Other
        OS/Version: Windows
            Status: NEW
          Keywords: rejects-valid
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: DMD
        AssignedTo: nobody puremagic.com
        ReportedBy: bearophile_hugs eml.cc



Problem found in dmd 2.042. This doesn't compile:

int foo() {
    int[int] aa;
    aa[1] = 2;
    return 0;
}
enum _ = foo();
void main() {}


Giving the errors:

test.d(3): Error: Cannot index null array aa
test.d(6): Error: cannot evaluate foo() at compile time
test.d(6): Error: cannot evaluate foo() at compile time

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Mar 28 2010
next sibling parent d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4019


Walter Bright <bugzilla digitalmars.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |bugzilla digitalmars.com



13:54:06 PDT ---
changeset 429

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Apr 01 2010
prev sibling next sibling parent d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4019


Don <clugdbug yahoo.com.au> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
                 CC|                            |clugdbug yahoo.com.au
         Resolution|                            |FIXED



Fixed DMD1.058 and DMD2.043.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Apr 09 2010
prev sibling next sibling parent d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4019


Mike van Dongen <puremagic mikevandongen.nl> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
                 CC|                            |puremagic mikevandongen.nl
            Version|future                      |D2
         Resolution|FIXED                       |



02:32:55 PST ---
It seems that when I use an 2D AA this problem still occurs.
This is the code I used:


enum auto i = test();

int test()
{
    string[][string] s;
    s["a"] ~= "anything";

    return 6;
}


It gives me almost the same error (on Linux x64) the OP had:

Error: cannot index null array s

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Nov 09 2012
prev sibling parent d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4019


Don <clugdbug yahoo.com.au> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|REOPENED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED




 It seems that when I use an 2D AA this problem still occurs.
Your test case is completely different to the original bug, it is a bug in ~=. Please do not reopen ancient bugs. The *only* time you should open a bug which was listed as fixed in a previous changelog, is if you find that the test cases in bug weren't actually fixed in that release. Moved to bug 9023. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Nov 14 2012