digitalmars.D.bugs - [Issue 3803] New: compiler segfaults
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (31/31) Feb 14 2010 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3803
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (11/11) Feb 15 2010 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3803
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (14/14) Feb 27 2010 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3803
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (21/21) Feb 28 2010 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3803
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (10/10) Mar 02 2010 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3803
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (12/12) Mar 08 2010 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3803
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3803 Summary: compiler segfaults Product: D Version: 1.056 Platform: Other OS/Version: Mac OS X Status: NEW Severity: regression Priority: P2 Component: DMD AssignedTo: nobody puremagic.com ReportedBy: fawzi gmx.ch The following (incorrect) code segfaults the compiler I suppose that it is connected with something segfault on correct code of {{{ struct S { int x; template T(int val) { const P T = { val }; // the P here is an error it should be S } } template V(R,int val){ const R V=R.T!(val); } const S x = V!(S,0); }}} -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Feb 14 2010
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3803 Don <clugdbug yahoo.com.au> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |clugdbug yahoo.com.au This was a regression since 1.053. Suprisingly, it is fixed by bug 3767, in svn 367. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Feb 15 2010
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3803 I have tried to find the problem using ldc (that shares the problem), also using the larger correct code that shows the problem (stacktraces are similar). The problem seems to be located in expression.c:5048 Dsymbol *s = ti->inst->toAlias(); ti->inst == NULL, so that the compiler segfaults. In the correct code I am not sure if inst is NULL because a single pass cannot instantiate the template, or because it is in an is expression. In any case simply catching this case and return new ErrorExp(); doesn't seem to be enough (then I have other problems). -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Feb 27 2010
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3803 a clean compile, and my fix doesn't look to bad. klickverbot even tested dstess, and it did not make anything worse. It might not be the correct fix, but still improves things. {{{ diff -r 9cc791423e20 dmd/expression.c --- a/dmd/expression.c Thu Feb 25 17:12:54 2010 -0700 +++ b/dmd/expression.c Sun Feb 28 23:59:36 2010 +0100 -5946,6 +5946,7 eleft = dte->e1; ti->tempdecl = td; ti->semantic(sc); + if (ti->inst == NULL) return new ErrorExp(); Dsymbol *s = ti->inst->toAlias(); Declaration *v = s->isDeclaration(); if (v) }}} -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Feb 28 2010
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3803 Kosmonaut <Kosmonaut tempinbox.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |Kosmonaut tempinbox.com --- SVN commit: http://www.dsource.org/projects/dmd/changeset/404 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Mar 02 2010
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3803 Walter Bright <bugzilla digitalmars.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |bugzilla digitalmars.com Resolution| |FIXED 22:23:57 PST --- Fixed dmd 1.057 and 2.041 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Mar 08 2010