digitalmars.D.bugs - [Issue 3792] New: Error: non-constant expression in xf.omg.core.LinearAlgebra
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (22/22) Feb 11 2010 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3792
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (7/7) Feb 11 2010 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3792
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (19/19) Feb 11 2010 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3792
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (8/8) Mar 08 2010 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3792
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (12/12) Mar 08 2010 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3792
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (11/11) Mar 09 2010 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3792
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (14/14) May 31 2010 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3792
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (16/16) Jun 24 2010 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3792
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (7/7) Apr 23 2011 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3792
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (11/11) May 30 2011 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3792
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3792
Summary: Error: non-constant expression in
xf.omg.core.LinearAlgebra
Product: D
Version: 1.056
Platform: Other
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: regression
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nobody puremagic.com
ReportedBy: fawzi gmx.ch
The conversions of scalars to Fixed type now fails at compile time.
There are several similar bugs to which it might be connected.
I join a reduced tango and xf independent test case.
Possibly connected to this xf.omg.core.CoordSys (that includes LinearAlgebra)
segfaults.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Feb 11 2010
d-bugmail puremagic.com http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3792 Created an attachment (id=566) a testcase that fails -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Feb 11 2010
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3792
Matti Niemenmaa <matti.niemenmaa+dbugzilla iki.fi> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |matti.niemenmaa+dbugzilla i
| |ki.fi
2010-02-11 08:55:10 PST ---
Reduced:
struct S {
int x;
template T(int val) {
const S T = { val };
}
}
const x = S.T!(0);
// arst.d(9): Error: non-constant expression (S).T
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Feb 11 2010
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3792 This bug is listed as fixed in 1.057, but while the reduced case by Matti Niemenmaa is indeed fixed, the original testcase still fails (I am pointing it out so that it stays open...) -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Mar 08 2010
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3792
Walter Bright <bugzilla digitalmars.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC| |bugzilla digitalmars.com
Resolution| |FIXED
22:24:37 PST ---
Fixed dmd 1.057
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Mar 08 2010
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3792
Fawzi Mohamed <fawzi gmx.ch> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED |
As I wrote in my previous comment, the attached testcase still fails...
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Mar 09 2010
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3792
Reduced test case for the case that still fails. It's the same, except that the
struct member is explicitly named in the struct initializer.
struct S {
int x;
template T(int val) {
const S T = { x: val };
}
}
const x = S.T!(0);
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
May 31 2010
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3792
The D2 version of this code never compiled without error.
struct S {
int x;
template T(int val) {
enum S T = { x: val };
}
}
const x = S.T!(0);
It fails to compile because init.c, StructInitializer::toExpression() returns
NULL if any of the fields have names ( if (field.data[i]) goto Lno; )
And this is just because it's never been implemented.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jun 24 2010
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3792 15:50:37 PDT --- D1 fix: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/da0159d02d0e4ecb7ad1afa4bc6da402e677846f -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Apr 23 2011
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3792
Don <clugdbug yahoo.com.au> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
Fixed DMD2.053
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
May 30 2011