digitalmars.D.bugs - [Issue 3694] New: Template this parameters don't work with operator overloads
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (38/38) Jan 10 2010 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3694
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (29/29) Mar 04 2010 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3694
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (6/6) Mar 08 2010 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3694
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (12/13) Mar 13 2010 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3694
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3694 Summary: Template this parameters don't work with operator overloads Product: D Version: 2.036 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: DMD AssignedTo: nobody puremagic.com ReportedBy: tomeksowi gmail.com PST --- Testcase: class A { int a; This opAssign(this This)(int a) { this.a = a; return this; } } void main() { A aa = new A; aa = 4; // oops! } Error: template test.A.opAssign(this This) does not match any function template declaration Error: template test.A.opAssign(this This) cannot deduce template function from argument types !()(int) ----------------------------------------------- The testcase should compile. Problem is that when operator overloads are used, template this parameters are not inferred. I suspect it's like that for all operator overloads (I tested only for assign and add, though). When you call the operator functions explicitly, aa.opAssign(4), it compiles. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jan 10 2010
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3694 gareth.charnock gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gareth.charnock gmail.com I can confirm this bug is still present in DMD 2.040. Test case used: struct ddouble(int l,int m /*other SI dimensions would go here*/) { this(double _val) {val=val;} ddouble!(l+l2,m+m2) opMult(int l2,int m2)(ddouble!(l2,m2) oprand) { return ddouble!(l+l2,m+m2)(val*oprand.val); } ddouble!(l+l2,m+m2) mult(int l2,int m2)(ddouble!(l2,m2) oprand) { return ddouble!(l+l2,m+m2)(val*oprand.val); } /* /,-,+ operators would go here */ double val; }; void main() { ddouble!(1,0) length=ddouble!(1,0)(1.0); ddouble!(0,1) mass =ddouble!(0,1)(1.0); auto t2=length.mult(mass); //Works auto t3=length*mass; //Error } testcase.d(28): Error: incompatible types for ((length) * (mass)): 'ddouble!(1,0)' and 'ddouble!(0,1)' -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Mar 04 2010
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3694 Bug appears to be fixed in DMD 2.041. Both test cases compile fine now. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Mar 08 2010
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3694 Tomasz SowiĆski <tomeksowi gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED PST ---Bug appears to be fixed in DMD 2.041. Both test cases compile fine now.Also works here. I'm marking as fixed. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Mar 13 2010