digitalmars.D.bugs - [Issue 2853] New: Property overriding problem
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (35/35) Apr 18 2009 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2853
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (4/4) Apr 18 2009 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2853
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (13/13) Feb 05 2010 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2853
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2853 Summary: Property overriding problem Product: D Version: 1.043 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: DMD AssignedTo: bugzilla digitalmars.com ReportedBy: d294934 bsnow.net class Base { int number() { return _number; } // getter int number(int value) { return _number; } // setter private: int _number; } class Extension: Base { override int number(int value) // override setter { return 0; } void method() { printNumber(this.number); // call base getter // main.d(21): Error: function main.Extension.number (int) does not match parameter types () // main.d(21): Error: expected 1 arguments, not 0 } } Tries call overrided setter --
Apr 18 2009
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2853 Fake properties must die, all I can say. --
Apr 18 2009
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2853 Witold Baryluk <baryluk smp.if.uj.edu.pl> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |baryluk smp.if.uj.edu.pl 06:01:31 PST --- Actually setter in the base class is not needed to trigger this bug. Also calling this.number() in method(), so adding call brackets, doesn't solve problem. So it is not only problem with setter/getter. This can lead to problem with perfectly valid code with no properties. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Feb 05 2010