digitalmars.D.bugs - [Issue 2853] New: Property overriding problem
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (35/35) Apr 18 2009 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2853
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (4/4) Apr 18 2009 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2853
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (13/13) Feb 05 2010 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2853
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2853
Summary: Property overriding problem
Product: D
Version: 1.043
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: bugzilla digitalmars.com
ReportedBy: d294934 bsnow.net
class Base
{
int number() { return _number; } // getter
int number(int value) { return _number; } // setter
private:
int _number;
}
class Extension: Base
{
override int number(int value) // override setter
{
return 0;
}
void method()
{
printNumber(this.number); // call base getter
// main.d(21): Error: function main.Extension.number (int) does
not match parameter types ()
// main.d(21): Error: expected 1 arguments, not 0
}
}
Tries call overrided setter
--
Apr 18 2009
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2853 Fake properties must die, all I can say. --
Apr 18 2009
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2853
Witold Baryluk <baryluk smp.if.uj.edu.pl> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |baryluk smp.if.uj.edu.pl
06:01:31 PST ---
Actually setter in the base class is not needed to trigger this bug.
Also calling this.number() in method(), so adding call brackets, doesn't solve
problem. So it is not only problem with setter/getter. This can lead to problem
with perfectly valid code with no properties.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Feb 05 2010









d-bugmail puremagic.com 