• d-bugmail puremagic.com (22/22) Apr 02 2009 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2786
• d-bugmail puremagic.com (12/12) Aug 27 2009 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2786

d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2786

           Summary: Interfaces should be able to require constructors
           Product: D
           Version: unspecified
          Platform: PC
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: enhancement
          Priority: P2
         Component: DMD
        AssignedTo: bugzilla digitalmars.com
        ReportedBy: andrei metalanguage.com


This should work:

interface Foo
{
    this(); // default construction is enabled
    this(this); // copy construction is enabled
    this(int); // construction from an int
}

Copy construction does not make sense for classes, but will make for struct
once struct inheritance of interfaces will be defined.


-- 

d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2786


Andrei Alexandrescu <andrei metalanguage.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID





14:29:53 PDT ---
I'm dropping this because introspection seems to be a better path to achieving
such requirements.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------