digitalmars.D.bugs - [Issue 1498] New: Recursive mixins are not allowed
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (27/27) Sep 13 2007 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1498
- BCS (2/33) Sep 13 2007 static foreach should cover this
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (5/5) Sep 13 2007 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1498
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (13/13) Jun 27 2009 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1498
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1498 Summary: Recursive mixins are not allowed Product: D Version: 1.021 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: DMD AssignedTo: bugzilla digitalmars.com ReportedBy: samukha voliacable.com I and other people have asked in the NG about recursive mixins and got no answer. Recursive mixins are probably tricky to implement but until they are implemented or the specs clearly prohibit them, it is a bug (and major one with respect to what I'm trying to do). template Foos(Funcs...) { static if (Funcs.length) { mixin Foos!(Funcs[1..$]); } } mixin Foos!(void function(), void function(int)); Error: mixin hello.Foos!(void(*)(),void(*)(int)).Foos!(void(*)(int)).Foos!() recursive mixin instantiation --
Sep 13 2007
Reply to d-bugmail puremagic.com,http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1498 Summary: Recursive mixins are not allowed Product: D Version: 1.021 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: DMD AssignedTo: bugzilla digitalmars.com ReportedBy: samukha voliacable.com I and other people have asked in the NG about recursive mixins and got no answer. Recursive mixins are probably tricky to implement but until they are implemented or the specs clearly prohibit them, it is a bug (and major one with respect to what I'm trying to do). template Foos(Funcs...) { static if (Funcs.length) { mixin Foos!(Funcs[1..$]); } } mixin Foos!(void function(), void function(int)); Error: mixin hello.Foos!(void(*)(),void(*)(int)).Foos!(void(*)(int)).Foos!() recursive mixin instantiationstatic foreach should cover this
Sep 13 2007
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1498 True, but it's going to be D 2.0 feature and remain a bug/undefined behavior in D 1.0 (which I am confined to because of Tango/DFL). --
Sep 13 2007
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1498 Christian Kamm <kamm-removethis incasoftware.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |kamm-removethis incasoftwar | |e.de Resolution| |FIXED 2009-06-27 10:08:51 PDT --- The test case passes for me with DMD 1.045 and seems to behave correctly. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jun 27 2009