www.digitalmars.com         C & C++   DMDScript  

digitalmars.D.bugs - [Issue 1405] New: Stack overflow when getting type info string of an invariant array

reply d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1405

           Summary: Stack overflow when getting type info string of an
                    invariant array
           Product: D
           Version: 2.003
          Platform: PC
        OS/Version: Windows
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: DMD
        AssignedTo: bugzilla digitalmars.com
        ReportedBy: samukha voliacable.com


invariant char[][] a = ["a", "b", "c"];

void main()
{
    auto s = typeid(typeof(a)).toString;
}

Error: Stack Overflow


--
Aug 08 2007
next sibling parent d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1405


smjg iname.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |smjg iname.com





Seems to work DMD 2.006.  But the result doesn't seem right.  Adding a write
statement gives:

invariant invariant char[][]


--
Oct 21 2007
prev sibling next sibling parent d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1405


Max Samukha <samukha voliacable.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED



PDT ---
dmd 2.035 outputs immutable(immutable(immutable(char)[])[]) which seems to be
correct

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Oct 21 2009
prev sibling next sibling parent d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1405






 dmd 2.035 outputs immutable(immutable(immutable(char)[])[]) which seems to be
 correct


Technically yes, though it ought to collapse the redundant immutables.

immutable(char[][])

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Oct 21 2009
prev sibling parent d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1405




PDT ---
Probably, yes. On the other hand, the non-normalized string can be easily
parsed as immutable reference to immutable array of immutable strings. Anyway,
it is not a bug.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Oct 21 2009