digitalmars.D.bugs - [Issue 1289] New: Class method without a function body should be abstract?
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (20/20) Jun 24 2007 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1289
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (11/11) Jun 28 2007 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1289
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1289
Summary: Class method without a function body should be abstract?
Product: D
Version: 1.016
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: bugzilla digitalmars.com
ReportedBy: onlystupidspamhere yahoo.se
The spec should state whether a method without a body is abstract or not. Of
course this also affects the behavior of compiler. For instance this fails when
linking:
class A { A f(); }
class B : A { B f() { return this; } }
void main() { B a = new B(); }
In some occasions similar code works, in others it doesn't.
--
Jun 24 2007
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1289
bugzilla digitalmars.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
This is working as designed. It allows one to implement a member function
elsewhere than the class definition. To have an abstract class, it must have
the 'abstract' storage class.
--
Jun 28 2007








d-bugmail puremagic.com