digitalmars.D.bugs - [Issue 1241] New: ICE on template instance parameter
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (38/38) May 18 2007 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1241
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (9/9) Jun 23 2007 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1241
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (32/32) Jul 22 2007 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1241
- =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Manuel_K=F6nig?= (52/96) Aug 01 2007 I just discovered a decent workaround. Instead of using templates with
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1241 Summary: ICE on template instance parameter Product: D Version: 1.014 Platform: PC OS/Version: All Status: NEW Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: DMD AssignedTo: bugzilla digitalmars.com ReportedBy: manuelk89 gmx.net The following template instance parameter crashes dmd when the parameter gets accessed: template List(L...) { alias L get; } template Foo(alias A) { int len1 = A.get.length; // access causes ICE } void main() { alias Foo!(List!(1,2,3)) foo; // instance parameter is List!(1,2,3) } ------------------------------- compile session: $ dmd main.d dmd: expression.c:4729: virtual Expression* DotIdExp::semantic(Scope*): Assertion `0' failed. Aborted (core dumped) --- PS: when this gets fixed there is a nice way to pass more than one Tuple to a template by just passing several template instances that carry the tuples in them (just as the List template above). --
May 18 2007
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1241 onlystupidspamhere yahoo.se changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |DUPLICATE *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 911 *** --
Jun 23 2007
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1241 shro8822 vandals.uidaho.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |shro8822 vandals.uidaho.edu I have also run into this one. I was trying to use the tuples+templates as compile time trees template Foo(A...) { template Bar(B...) { alias A a; alias B b; } } alias Foo!(Foo!(1,2,3).Bar!(4,5,6)).Bar!(Foo!(7,8,9).Bar!(10,11,12)) tree; foreach( a; tree.a) { foreach(aa; a.a); foreach(ab; a.b); } foreach( b; tree.b) { foreach(ba; b.a); foreach(bb; b.b); } Can we please get a fix on this one? It will drop a LOT of barriers to elaborate template systems. I have a few really cool things that use it and would like to put them in my talk without the disclaimer of "this would work --
Jul 22 2007
d-bugmail puremagic.com wrote:http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1241 shro8822 vandals.uidaho.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |shro8822 vandals.uidaho.edu I have also run into this one. I was trying to use the tuples+templates as compile time trees template Foo(A...) { template Bar(B...) { alias A a; alias B b; } } alias Foo!(Foo!(1,2,3).Bar!(4,5,6)).Bar!(Foo!(7,8,9).Bar!(10,11,12)) tree; foreach( a; tree.a) { foreach(aa; a.a); foreach(ab; a.b); } foreach( b; tree.b) { foreach(ba; b.a); foreach(bb; b.b); } Can we please get a fix on this one? It will drop a LOT of barriers to elaborate template systems. I have a few really cool things that use it and would like to put them in my talk without the disclaimer of "this would workI just discovered a decent workaround. Instead of using templates with tuple members, just use structs: Use struct Tuple(T...) { alias T tp; } instead of template Tuple(T...) { alias T tp; } I tested this with dmd1.020 and rewrote your tree structure using this trick: import std.stdio; struct Foo(A...) { struct Bar(B...) { alias A a; alias B b; } } alias Foo!(Foo!(1,2,3).Bar!(4,5,6)).Bar!(Foo!(7,8,9).Bar!(10,11,12)) tree; void main() { foreach( a; tree.a) { foreach(aa; a.a) writefln(aa); foreach(ab; a.b) writefln(ab); } foreach( b; tree.b) { foreach(ba; b.a) writefln(ba); foreach(bb; b.b) writefln(bb); } } This prints 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 for me. Happy coding!
Aug 01 2007